Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wimberly v. Gatch, 635 So. 2d 206.

132 citing documents.

Holmes v. LSU/EA Conway Medical Center 997 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), ; Sun Oil Co. v. Tarver, 219 La.
Richard Hargett v. Estate of Daniel N. Hargett, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94)
Hargett v. ESTATE OF HARGETT 977 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
DOMINION EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION v. Waters 972 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
OIL INS. LTD. v. Dow Chemical Co. 977 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
See Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), ; -29 (La.1992), and compare Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707 pp. 6-9 (La.6/21/02), -09 (burden remains on exceptor if contra non valentem principle codified into the applicable prescriptive codal article or statute).
Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc. 964 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Edwards v. Alexander 960 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Wimberly *348 v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Eric Petry v. Sid Hebert, Sheriff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 2/3/99), (quoting Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), ).
Petry v. Hebert 957 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 2/3/99), (quoting Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), ).
Thomas v. State ex rel. Department of Health 934 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Distinguished Franz v. Ledoux 927 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Metro Electric & Maintenance, Inc. v. Bank One Corporation and Janece Riser La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
4/11/94), [citations omitted]: The courts created the doctrine of contra non valentem, as an exception to the general rules of prescription.
METRO ELEC. & MAINTENANCE v. Bank One Corp. 924 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The supreme court discussed the doctrine of contra non valentem in Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361, pp. 8-9 (La.4/11/94), [citations omitted]: The courts created the doctrine of contra non valentem, as an exception to the general rules of prescription.
Babineaux v. DOTD 927 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Martinez Management, Inc. v. Caston 900 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
and Development, 01-1646 (La.2/26/02), ; Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Alexander v. Fulco 895 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Jamie Hebert v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Hebert v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 884 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 2/3/99), (quoting Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), ).
Melba Braud v. Dr. William A. Cenac La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Lola Bowie v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94)
Bowie v. Rapides Parish School Board 867 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94); ; (La.
Eastin v. Entergy Corp. 865 So. 2d 49 La. 2004
This court in Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), , recognized four limited situations where the doctrine applies to prevent the running of prescription.
Thornton v. City of Shreveport 865 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), ; Hughes v. Olin Corp., 37,404 (La.
Bordelon v. Medical Center of Baton Rouge 871 So. 2d 1075 La. 2004
LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221 (La.7/8/98), ; Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Mary L. Brown v. Avoyelles Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Brown v. Avoyelles Parish School Bd. 861 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 4/4/01), , writ denied, 01-1346 (La.6/22/01), (quoting Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361, p. 4 (La.4/11/94), ).
Deal v. Powell 862 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Bordelon v. Medical Center of Baton Rouge 857 So. 2d 376 La. 2003
LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221 (La.7/8/98), ; Wimberly v. Catch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Doe v. Jones 857 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Bell v. Kreider 858 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Raymond v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 856 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. MLT CON. 849 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
*772 In Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), , the Supreme Court set forth four categories in which prescription is usually suspended under the doctrine of contra non valentem: (1) where there was some legal cause which prevented the courts or their officers from taking cognizance of or acting on the plaintiff's action; (2) where there was some condition co
Eastin v. Entergy Corp. 844 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Amoco Production Co. v. Texaco, Inc. 838 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Williams v. Holiday Inn Worldwide 816 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
: The courts created the doctrine of contra non valentem, as an exception to the general rules of prescription.
Doe v. Archdiocese of New Orleans 823 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Drake v. Sarpy Properties, Inc. 817 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[5] Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), at 211 .
Stett v. Greve 810 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Steele v. Steele, 98-693 (La.App.
Picard v. Vermilion Parish School Bd. 783 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
This is known as the suspensive theory of contra non valentem agere nulla currit praescripto, or "`prescription does not run against a party unable to act.'" Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361, p. 4 (La.4/11/94); .
State v. Brauner 782 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Edwards v. Sawyer Industrial Plastics, Inc. 738 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Southern v. Bank One of Louisiana, NA 740 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), ; Corsey v. State, Through Department of Corrections
Cornay v. FMC Corp. 735 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
As explained by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94); , the doctrine of contra non valentem is contrary to the express provisions found in the Louisiana Civil Code.
Williams v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 740 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), , rehearing denied (5/12/94).
Foraker v. BOARD OF SUP'RS OF STATE UNIV. 734 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), ; Harrison v. Gore, 27,254 (La.App.2d Cir.8/23/95), , writ denied, 95-2347 (La.12/8/95), .
Turnage v. Columbia Lakeside Hosp. 731 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Steele v. Steele 732 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Schoen v. Walling 728 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), ; Clayborn Timber Co. v. Butler, supra.
Touchet v. Baker Hughes Inc. 737 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), .
Wadsworth v. ABC Ins. Co. 732 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
ed with a contract or connected with the proceedings that prevented the creditor from suing or acting; (3) where the debtor himself has done some act that effectually prevents the creditor from availing himself of his cause of action; and, (4)