Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Krielow v. Krielow, 635 So. 2d 180.

23 citing documents.

Melanie Blanchard Tauzin v. Todd Charles Tauzin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Susana F. Moody v. Ross Moody La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Elizabeth B. Downey v. Kenneth A. Downey La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Gereighty v. Domingue 249 So. 3d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4/11/94), , 187, the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that "[h]ouse payments, taxes, and insurance premiums are ordinary and customary expenses of the marriage."
Daigle Oil Distributors, LLC v. Elizabeth Irene Istre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Daigle Oil Distribs., LLC v. Istre 243 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Kristin Sweezy Harriss v. Micah Bradley Harriss La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Harriss v. Harriss 204 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Kevin J. St. Marie v. Lisa M. Roy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
St. Marie v. Roy 29 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Roy attempts to bolster her argument by first citing Krielow v. Krielow, 93-2539 (La.4/11/94), .
Brenda Bordelon v. Gregory D. Bordelon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Bordelon v. Bordelon 942 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Krielow v. Krielow, 93-2539 (La.4/11/94), .
Sequeira v. Sequeira 888 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
NOTES [1] Krielow v. Krielow, 93-2539 (La.4/11/94), ; see also Sherrod v. Sherrod, 97-907 (La.App.
Bourgeois v. Bourgeois 818 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
3rd Cir.1993), rev'd on other grounds, 93-2539 (La.4/11/94), .
Brehm v. Brehm 762 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Salley v. Salley, 95-0387 (La.10/16/95), ; Krielow v. Krielow, 93-2539 (La.4/11/94), .
In Re Succession of Moss 769 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Krielow v. Krielow, 93-2539 (La.4/11/94); .
Kline v. Kline 741 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Krielow v. Krielow, 93-2539 (La.4/11/94); .
Stewart v. Stewart 728 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Krielow v. Krielow, 93-2539 (La.4/11/94); and Salley v. Salley, 95-0387 (La.10/16/95); are persuasive.
Sherrod v. Sherrod 709 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
In Krielow v. Krielow, 93-2539 (La.4/11/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the burden of proof is on the party claiming reimbursement to show by a preponderance of the evidence the nature of the indebtedness, whether the community obligations were incurred for the ordinary and customary expenses of the marriage.
Keene v. Reggie 701 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Major v. Major 671 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
4/11/94), pp. 8-9, ; also see, (La.App.
Salley v. Salley 661 So. 2d 437 La. 1995
4/11/94), , to proceeds of a stock redemption in a closely held family corporation.
Salley v. Salley 647 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994