DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 650 So. 2d 712.

45 citing documents.

  • Sharon Tisdale v. David Hedrick As Sheriff Of Concordia Parish And Matthew Morgan La. 2023
    11/30/94), see also Id., 93- 2818 at 1; 650 So.2d at 729 (Lemmon, J. dissenting) (“The spectrum of degrees of 8 fault runs from simple negligence to gross negligence to willful and wanton conduct to intentional conduct.”) Thus, in considering the Watson factors, we inherently recognize that this spectrum of culpability
  • Matthew A. Dephillips, Individually, And On Behalf Of La. 2020
  • Denee Ashley Pike and Trent Pike v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • Pike v. Calcasieu Parish Sch. Bd. 272 So. 3d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • Washington v. Gusman 183 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818, p. 7 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Wayne Guillot, Et Ux. v. Reece Guillot, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Kenneth Turner v. Shop Rite, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    11/30/94), that negligent tortfeasors should not be allowed to reduce their fault based on the intentional fault of another tortfeasor.
  • Turner v. Shop Rite, Inc. 149 So. 3d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    DISCUSSION Plaintiff argues that the trial court should have denied the summary judgment based on the holding of Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), , that negligent tortfeasors should not be allowed to reduce their fault based on the intentional fault of another tortfeasor.
  • Richard Le v. Nitetown, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Le v. Nitetown, Inc. 72 So. 3d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), -20 .
  • Hendrickson v. Guillory 15 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The cases cited by the plaintiff, Potter v. First Federal S & L, -326 (La.1993); Veazey v. Elmwood, Planation Association, (La.App.
  • Thomas v. Sheridan 977 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    11/30/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that under the existing law, fault of an intentional and a negligent tortfeasor could be compared, but the question of whether such fault should be compared was a determination for the trial court to be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account public policy conside
  • Scott v. American Tobacco Co., Inc. 949 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Rather, the previous rule enunciated in Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), , and confirmed by the Landry court is applicable, i.e., Section C of La.
  • Ginger McIntosh, Indiv. v. Wayne F. McElveen, Sheriff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • McIntosh v. McElveen 893 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    The court stated: Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to apportion fault to Jessie Magee, an intentional tortfeasor, and in refusing to instruct *996 the jury on fault apportionment as set forth by the supreme court in Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Boudreaux v. Jeff 884 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    1st Cir.12/22/00), , 1236 n. 6, writ denied, 01-0233 (La.3/23/01), ; see also Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Assoc., Inc., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), , 737 n. 8.
  • In re the Succession of Horn 877 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • Landry v. Bellanger 851 So. 2d 943 La. 2003
    Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Ashmore v. Hilton 834 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), , would be appropriate.
  • Scott v. American Tobacco 830 So. 2d 294 La. 2002
    Green Indus., Inc., 97-3188 (La.7/8/98), , and Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94)
  • Riley v. Maison Orleans II, Inc. 829 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    [4] The plaintiffs cause of action arose during the period of time that Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2828 (La.11/30/94), , was applicable law.
  • Louviere v. Louviere 839 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    That court stated: Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to apportion fault to Jessie Magee, an intentional tortfeasor, and in refusing to instruct the jury on fault apportionment as set forth by the supreme court in Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust Company 816 So. 2d 270 La. 2002
    Relying on this Court's decision in Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), , the Court of Appeal declined to reduce Merchant Bank's liability for damages by the percentage of fault attributable to the intentional tortfeasors.
  • Trahan v. Asphalt Associates, Inc. 800 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    See, Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94); (opinion of Hall, Justice, dissenting).
  • Frazer v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 774 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    The plaintiffs argue that the same public policy considerations that allowed a trial court the discretion to compare the fault of fewer than all persons responsible for an injury that were used in Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), , are applicable in the present case.
  • Livestock Producers, Inc. v. Littleton 748 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    The court stated that the percentage of fault attributable to Smith was not allocated pursuant to Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), , dealing with the assessment of fault in cases involving both intentional torts and negligence.
  • Dixie Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. Pitre 751 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5 Cir.1993), writ granted 93-2818 (La.2/4/94), , affirmed by 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Franklin Southland Printing v. Noab 739 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    5 Cir.1993), aff'd, 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank 738 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    In Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818, p. 8 (La.11/30/94); , which we find compelling, logical, valid, and applicable to the facts in this case, the Louisiana Supreme Court framed the issue as, "whether the comparative fault law extends to wrongful conduct at the opposite end of the spectrum—intentional torts."
  • Posecai v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 731 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    In that case, we did not discuss Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94)
  • Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 738 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    COURT'S CHARGE TO JURY ON FAULT APPORTIONMENT Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in allowing the jury to apportion fault to Jessie Magee, an intentional tortfeasor, and in refusing to instruct the jury on fault apportionment as set forth by the supreme court in Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Wijngaarde v. Parents of Guy 720 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    [3] The trial judge perhaps relied upon Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), , in which a very divided Supreme Court held: ...
  • Muse v. Dunbar 716 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    In support of their contention, Muse and Joubert argue that Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94); , prohibits the comparison of fault between intentional and negligent tortfeasors in the present situation.
  • Babb v. Boney 710 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    10, supplement p. 3 (West 1998), [1] and Green v. USAA Cas.
  • Marceaux v. Gibbs 699 So. 2d 1065 La. 1997
    The other issue of concern involves whether the rule established in Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., that allows comparison of fault between intentional tortfeasors and negligent tortfeasor is applicable.
  • Daye v. General Motors Corp. 712 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    See Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94)
  • Berry v. Insurance Co. of North America 683 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Recently in Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94), , the Supreme Court reviewed the broad civilian concept of fault stating: "[F]ault under civilian theory clearly includes more than just negligence; it extends the gamut from strict liability to intentional torts."
  • Marceaux v. Gibbs 680 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Abbyad v. Mathes Group 671 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    This could explain why the Supreme Court went to such trouble in Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Assoc., Ltd., 93-2818 (La.11/30/94); , in discussing the fault of the rapist who does not appear to have been named as a party in that suit.
  • Thomas v. Busby 670 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    11/30/94); , the defendants contend that the trial court erred in failing to consider Thomas' comparative fault in causing a scene and in publicizing the incident.
  • Green v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 668 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • New Orleans Riverwalk Assoc. v. RP GUASTELLA, INC. 664 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    11/30/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "`fault' under civilian theory clearly includes more than just negligence; it extends the gamut from strict liability to intentional torts."
  • Harper v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 664 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    11/30/94); , held that while Louisiana law is broad enough to allow comparison of fault between intentional tortfeasors and negligent tortfeasors, a determination of whether such a comparison should be made must be determined by the trial court on a case by case basis, bearing in mind public policy concerns discussed in that cas
  • State v. Fenner 664 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • Hattori v. Peairs 662 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    11/30/94); , examined the concept of comparative fault as it exists in Louisiana today, and whether this theory could be extended to encompass harms caused by intentional torts.