DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thibodeaux v. Diamond M Drilling Co., 632 So. 2d 736.

93 citing documents.

  • Bailey v. Battiest Construction Co. 809 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94), .
  • Distinguished Campbell v. State Farm Ins. Co. 804 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94), , are distinguishable.
  • Hardge v. Dubosq 797 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Co., 93-509 (La.2/28/94); ; Armand v. Rhodes, 96-15 (La.App.
  • Young v. First National Bank of Shreveport 794 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Crabtree v. State Farm Insurance Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94), .
  • Armand v. Belt 799 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94); ; Talley v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of La., 99-1974 (La.App.
  • Y'Barbo v. Diamond 770 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Co., 93-0509, p. 6 (La.2/28/94), .
  • Bel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 767 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See Ferrell v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., 96-3028, p. 11 (La.7/1/97), (Although loss of consortium claims are derivative, extent of coverage is nonetheless governed by the language of the policy); see also Crabtree v. State Farm Insurance Co., 93-0509, p. 7 (La.2/28/94), (Court rejected position that a claim would fall within the single person policy limit merely because a claim "resulted from" bodily injuries to another.
  • Town of Basile v. Clark 769 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    The supreme court in Thibodeaux v. Diamond M Drilling Co., 93-2963 (La.2/25/94); , addressed the application of the provision and stated that: This section [section B] did not provide a credit against an award of supplemental earnings benefits until it was amended effective January 1, 1990.
  • Talley v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana 760 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Crabtree v. State Farm Insurance Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94), .
  • Aucoin v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 771 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94); .
  • Etienne v. National Auto. Ins. Co. 759 So. 2d 51 La. 2000
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94), .
  • Ashy v. Migues 760 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94); .
  • Paxton v. Sanderson 763 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Co., 93-0509 (La.02/28/94), ; Pareti v. Sentry Indem.
  • Kite v. Gus Kaplan Inc. 747 So. 2d 503 La. 1999
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94), , which purports to declare that mental anguish is covered as bodily injury in the policies *514 there at issue.
  • Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 747 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    As explained by the supreme court in Crabtree v. State Farm Ins., 93-0509, p. 6 (La.2/28/94); , an insurance "policy should be construed as a whole and one portion thereof should not be construed separately at the expense of disregarding another."
  • Doe v. Mires 741 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 2/18/98) ; , citing Crabtree v. State Farm Insurance Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94); (footnotes omitted): 13An insurance policy is a contract between the parties and should be construed using the general rules of interpretation of contracts set forth in the Civil Code.
  • Doe v. Mires 741 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 2/18/98) ; , citing Crabtree v. State Farm Insurance Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94); (footnotes omitted): An insurance policy is a contract between the parties and should be construed using the general rules of interpretation of contracts set forth in the Civil Code.
  • Christ Episcopal Church of Bastrop v. Church Insurance Co. 731 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94), ; Crigler v. Crigler, 28,085 (La.App.2d Cir.4/3/96), , writs denied, 96-1092, 96-1148 (La.6/7/96), .
  • Bernard v. Chrysler Ins. Co. 734 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Co., 93-509 (La.2/28/94); ; Armand v. Rhodes, 96-15 (La.App.
  • Gedward v. Sonnier 728 So. 2d 1265 La. 1999
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94), ; Pareti v. Sentry Indem.
  • Peterson v. Schimek 729 So. 2d 1024 La. 1999
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94), .
  • Ducote v. Koch Pipeline Co., LP 730 So. 2d 432 La. 1999
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94); .
  • Ledet v. Leighton 736 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 2/18/98) ; , citing Crabtree v. State Farm Insurance Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94); (footnotes omitted): An insurance policy is a contract between the parties and should be construed using the general rules of interpretation of contracts set forth in the Civil Code.
  • Nelson v. Want Ads of Shreveport, Inc. 720 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94), , and cases cited therein.
  • Eason v. Financial Indem. Co. 721 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Co., 93-0509 (La2/28/94); ; Central Louisiana Elec.
  • Haas v. Audubon Indem. Co. 722 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    Crabtree v. State Farm Insurance Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94); .
  • Distinguished Aucoin v. Doerner 717 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    cited as authority by plaintiffs.
  • Wartelle v. Women's and Children's Hosp., Inc. 704 So. 2d 778 La. 1997
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94), , 741 n. 11
  • Minor v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 700 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Fallen v. New Orleans Police Dept. 697 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    In Thibodeaux v. Diamond M Drilling Co., 93-2963 (La.2/25/94), , the Supreme Court held that the 1990 amendment was substantive and disallowed its retroactive application.
  • Ferrell v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 696 So. 2d 569 La. 1997
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94); , provides the proper framework for analyzing whether Mrs. Ferrell's loss of consortium claim is to be satisfied out of the per person or per accident limits of the Fireman's Fund policy.
  • Valentine v. Bonneville Ins. Co. 691 So. 2d 665 La. 1997
  • Conner v. Stanford 692 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in disregarding the recent Louisiana Supreme Court case of Crabtree v. State Farm Insurance Company, 93-0509 (La.2/28/94); .
  • Trahan v. McManus 689 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    See Crabtree v. State Farm Insurance Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94); ; Landreneau v. Fruge, 94-553 (La.App.
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cooper 707 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Co., 93-0509 (La.2/28/94), (notes omitted).
  • Armand v. Rhodes 685 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Co., 93-509 (La.2/28/94); ; Central Louisiana Elec.
  • Armand v. Rhodes 685 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Co., 93-509 (La.2/28/94); ; Central Louisiana Elec.
  • Tolis v. Shields 684 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    The derivative claim does not come into existence until someone else is injured.” , 740 (La.1994), (La.App.
  • Losavio v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 675 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    2/28/94), , citing, Central La.
  • Dubois v. PARISH GOV. RISK AGENCY-GROUP HEALTH 670 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Mason v. Auto Convoy 662 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Trahan v. McManus 653 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • South Cent. Bell v. Ka-Jon Food Stores 644 So. 2d 357 La. 1994
    2/28/94); Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.