DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv., 639 So. 2d 216.

487 citing documents.

  • McCaskill v. Rosiere 20 So. 3d 496 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department *501 Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), ; Ferrell v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.
  • Wilson v. Rahman 22 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Ambulance Serv., 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Owen v. Smith 16 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Husband v. TENET HEALTH. MEMOR. MED. CENTER 16 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), , for the proposition that "[b]ecause the court of appeal has a constitutional function to perform, it has every right to determine whether the trial court verdict was clearly wrong based on the evidence, or clearly without evidentiary support."
  • Husband v. Tenet HealthSystems Memorial Medical Center, Inc. 16 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In support of this argument, Defendants cite Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep’t. Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), , for the proposition that “[b]ecause the court of appeal has a constitutional function to perform, it has every right to determine whether the trial court verdict was clearly wrong based on the evidence, or clearly without evidentiary support.” Id.
  • Guillory v. Lee 16 So. 3d 1104 La. 2009
    Perkins, 782 So.2d at 612 (citing Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112, p. 8 (La.7/5/94), ).
  • Watters v. Department of Social Services 15 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep’t Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. 16 So. 3d 1065 La. 2009
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep’t Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), (holding that cause-in-fact is a question of fact); Peterson v. Gibraltar Sav.
  • Arnold v. Ouachita Parish Fire Department 12 So. 3d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Nunnery v. City of Kenner 17 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Id.; Ambrose v. New Orleans Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), ; Cannet v. Franklynn Pest Control Company, 08-56 (La.App.
  • White v. American International Group, Inc. 11 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), ; Cannet v. Franklynn Pest Control Company, 08-56 (La.App.
  • McGowan v. Loupe 11 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112, p. 7 (La.7/5/94), ; Cannet , 08-56 at 5, 985 So.2d at 274 .
  • Eisenhardt v. Snook 8 So. 3d 541 La. 2009
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Moore v. Talbot 5 So. 3d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Marshall Ex Rel. Minor Chil. v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 2 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep’t Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, p. 8 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Brown v. ANA Ins. Group 994 So. 2d 1265 La. 2008
    In Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), , this Court set forth a definition of "gross negligence": Gross negligence has been defined as the "want of even slight care and diligence" and the "want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise."
  • Baker Printing Company, Inc. v. Kimball Properties, LLC 986 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Nelson v. Nelson 985 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    It should be noted however that this court has already rejected that argument in Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), and, more recently, by unanimous vote in Nabors Drilling USA v. Davis, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/21/03), .
  • Moore v. Acadian Ambulance Air Med 983 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Const. art. 5, §§ 5(C), 10(B); Clement, ; Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Linda Moore v. Safeway Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Const. art. 5, §§ 5(C), 10(B); Clement, Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94)
  • HUTSEN v. Davis 983 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep't Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Anita Hutsen v. Tommie Lea Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep’t Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94)
  • Cannet v. Franklynn Pest Control Co., Inc. 985 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), ; Garrett v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., L.L.C., 04-804 (La.App.
  • Anderson v. Anderson 980 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Serv., 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112, pp. 5-6 (La.7/5/94), , 219-220 and *19 citations within.
  • Woolfolk v. TRISM, INC. 976 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Therefore, we look to the following pronouncement from Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Service, 93-3099, pp. 8-9 *219 (La.7/5/94), -221 , for guidance: this Court held that the court of appeal should not upset the factual findings of a trial court absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.
  • Rowell v. Jacobs 975 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Crisler v. Paige One, Inc. 974 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), .
  • McCain v. Howell 971 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Service, 93-3099, p. 8 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Marie Langlinais v. Dr. Richard Dearman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Langlinais v. Dearman 957 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep't Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Hogan v. Morgan 960 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Gutierrez v. Moezzi 957 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    It should be noted however that this court has already rejected that argument in Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), and, more recently, by unanimous vote in Nabors Drilling USA v. Davis, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/21/03), .
  • Margaret L. Landreneau v. Toby L. Landreneau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep’t Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94)
  • Rabalais v. Nash 952 So. 2d 653 La. 2007
    7/5/94), ; State v. Vinzant, 200 La.
  • Hww Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A Worldwide Professional Services v. Environmental Treatment Team, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112, p. 8 (La.7/5/94)
  • Hww Enterprises v. Environmental Treatment 952 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112, p. 8 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Connie Mouhot v. Twelfth Street Baptist Church La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Mouhot v. Twelfth Street Baptist Church 949 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Const. art. 5, §§ 5(C), 10(B); Clement, ; Ambrose v. New Orleans *671 Police Dept. Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Morgan v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 951 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112, p. 8 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Lam Ex Rel Lam v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins 946 So. 2d 133 La. 2006
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep't Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, p. 8 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Brenda Bordelon v. Gregory D. Bordelon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Bordelon v. Bordelon 942 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Alicia Lester v. Dr. Robert Levy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112, p. 8 (La.7/5/94)
  • Davis v. Allstate Property & Cas. Ins. Co. 941 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), ; Ferrell v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
  • Md v. State, Dept. of Social Services 943 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    In Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112, pp. 5-6 (La.7/5/94), -220 , the supreme court addressed the concept of gross negligence as follows: Gross negligence has been defined as the "want of even slight care and diligence" and the "want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise."
  • Patsy Ann Collins Domingue v. Excalibar Minerals of La La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Domingue v. EXCALIBAR MINERALS OF LOUISIANA 936 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Const. art. 5, §§ 5(C), 10(B); Clement, ; Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, 93-3110, 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Andry v. Murphy Oil, USA, Inc. 935 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Sims v. Ward 938 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Meyer v. Tufaro 934 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099 (La.7/5/94), ; Ferrell v. Fireman's Fund Ins.