Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams v. General Motors Corp., 639 So. 2d 275.

19 citing documents.

Raven Boyance, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child Rashawn Boyance v. United Fire & Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
4 Cir. 2/11/94), writs denied, 94-1896, 94-1898 (La.
Maddox v. Bailey 146 So. 3d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4th Cir.6/15/94), (on rehearing), writ denied, 94-1898 (La.11/11/94), , the Fourth Circuit concluded that the trial court erred by permitting the jury to receive evidence to prove a manufacturing defect in the rack and pinion steering assembly of the vehicle involved in the case, when the entire case had been premise
Buffman Inc. v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 36 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
4 Cir. *1016 2/11/94), , to support its contention that a new trial is warranted because the trial court improperly allowed testimony of a "new theory" on rebuttal.
Harvey Canal Ltd. Partnership v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 39 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Raiford v. U.S. Industries/Ames Lawn & Garden Tools 929 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 2/11/94) , , this Court held on rehearing that it was impermissible for the trial court to allow expert testimony to advance a theory of causation at trial that differed from the theory of causation upon which all of the pretrial discovery had been based.
Raiford v. US INDUSTRIES/AMES LAWN 929 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 2/11/94) , , this Court held on rehearing that it was impermissible for the trial court to allow expert testimony to advance a theory of causation at trial that differed from the theory of causation upon which all of the pretrial discovery had been based.
Joseph Lionel Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 2/11/94), writs denied, 94-1896, 94-1898 (La.
Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 2/11/94) , , writs denied, 94-1896, 94-1898 (La.11/11/94), -88, where the court found error with the trial court's allowance of expert trial testimony which presented a new theory of liability in a products liability case, requires that we find error with the trial court's rulings on Mr. Hebert's testimony.
Guillory v. Dillard's Dept. Store, Inc. 777 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
App. 4 Cir.1994); (wherein the court found the plaintiff's expert testimony inadmissible after the plaintiff failed to produce evidence within its control).
Kose v. Cablevision of Shreveport 755 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
App. 4th Cir. 2/11/94), , writs denied, 94-1896, 94-1898 (La.11/11/94), , 388, for their argument that the additional testing and new expert opinions based thereon were improperly admitted at trial.
Perry v. Anderson 751 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
(4th Cir.1994) on rehearing at , cited the Gonzales case for the proposition that the appellate court must decide the case and not remand it.
Crane v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. 743 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
4th Cir. 2/11/94), , writs denied, XX-XXXX-XX-XXXX (La.11/11/94), , 388; Morehead v. Ford Motor Co., 29,399 (La.App.
Edwards v. Daugherty 729 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 2/11/94) , , writ denied, 94-1898 (La.11/11/94), , 388; Johnson v. Department of Pub.
Morehead v. Ford Motor Co. 694 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
4 Cir. 2/11/94) , , writs denied, 94-1896, 94-1898 (La.11/11/94), , 388.
Boutte v. Nissan Motor Corp. 663 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
4 Cir. 6/15/94) ; , writs denied, 94-1896, 94-1898, , 388 (La.
Young v. Logue 660 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
4th Cir. 6/15/94), (on rehearing), writs denied, 94-1896, 94-1898 (La.
Seymour v. Cigna Insurance Co. 653 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc. 650 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
4th Cir. 2/11/94), *391 writs denied, 94-1896, (La.
Jones v. Trailor 636 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by