Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ratcliff v. Boydell, 674 So. 2d 272.
-
Sullivan v. Malta Park
156 So. 3d 751
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 4/3/96) , (“defendants’ vindictive, dilatory, and obstreperous behavior” in litigating a fee dispute for six years coupled with, among other things, "defendants' knowledge that plaintiff had more than an ordinary dislike for trial having themselves sent her to two psychiatrists during the wrongful death proceedings” consti
-
Smart v. Vazquez
119 So. 3d 901
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 4/3/96), , amended as to interest on rehearing, (La.App.
- Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 973 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- Adrienne Patout Smith v. Roy Patout La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Smith v. Patout 956 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
Penton v. Healy
894 So. 2d 537
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 4/3/96), , we stated that to prove abuse of process, the plaintiff must prove an ulterior motive and willful acts in the use of the process not proper in the regular conduct of litigation.
-
Smith v. Slattery
877 So. 2d 244
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
4th Cir.04/03/96), , amended as to interest on rehearing, (La.App.
-
Penton v. Healy
863 So. 2d 684
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 4/3/96), (to prove abuse of process, the plaintiff must prove an ulterior motive and willful acts in the use of the process not proper in the regular conduct of litigation).
-
Atkinson v. LeBlanc
860 So. 2d 60
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
4th Cir.4/3/96), , amended as to interest on rehearing, (La.App.
- E.M.S. v. Crescent City E.M.S. 829 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- PRIORITY EMS v. Crescent City EMS 829 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- In re DuBarry 814 So. 2d 1273 La. 2002
-
Johnson v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport
792 So. 2d 33
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 4/3/96) ; (La.App.
- In re Boydell 760 So. 2d 326 La. 2000
-
Landrum v. Board of Com'rs
685 So. 2d 382
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
4th Cir. 4/3/96), ("defendants' vindictive, dilatory, and obstreperous behavior" in litigating a fee dispute for six years constituted intentional infliction of emotional distress).