Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ratcliff v. Boydell, 674 So. 2d 272.

15 citing documents.

  • Sullivan v. Malta Park 156 So. 3d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 4/3/96) , (“defendants’ vindictive, dilatory, and obstreperous behavior” in litigating a fee dispute for six years coupled with, among other things, "defendants' knowledge that plaintiff had more than an ordinary dislike for trial having themselves sent her to two psychiatrists during the wrongful death proceedings” consti
  • Smart v. Vazquez 119 So. 3d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 4/3/96), , amended as to interest on rehearing, (La.App.
  • Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 973 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • Adrienne Patout Smith v. Roy Patout La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Smith v. Patout 956 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Penton v. Healy 894 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    4 Cir. 4/3/96), , we stated that to prove abuse of process, the plaintiff must prove an ulterior motive and willful acts in the use of the process not proper in the regular conduct of litigation.
  • Smith v. Slattery 877 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    4th Cir.04/03/96), , amended as to interest on rehearing, (La.App.
  • Penton v. Healy 863 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 4/3/96), (to prove abuse of process, the plaintiff must prove an ulterior motive and willful acts in the use of the process not proper in the regular conduct of litigation).
  • Atkinson v. LeBlanc 860 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    4th Cir.4/3/96), , amended as to interest on rehearing, (La.App.
  • E.M.S. v. Crescent City E.M.S. 829 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • PRIORITY EMS v. Crescent City EMS 829 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • In re DuBarry 814 So. 2d 1273 La. 2002
  • Johnson v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport 792 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 4/3/96) ; (La.App.
  • In re Boydell 760 So. 2d 326 La. 2000
  • Landrum v. Board of Com'rs 685 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    4th Cir. 4/3/96), ("defendants' vindictive, dilatory, and obstreperous behavior" in litigating a fee dispute for six years constituted intentional infliction of emotional distress).