DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State in Interest of AC, 643 So. 2d 743.

30 citing documents.

  • Karen Cohen Kinnett Versus Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    10/17/94), citing In re Adoption of B.G.S., supra, at 552.
  • State ex rel. J.S. 238 So. 3d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    10/17/94), , 748 (citing La.
  • Monojit Banerjee v. Shalini Banerjee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    State in Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94)
  • Banerjee v. Banerjee 258 So. 3d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • DeJean v. Purpera 199 So. 3d 11 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
    anches, nor any person holding office in one of them, shall exercise power belonging to either of the others.” This section stands for the proposition that “the Constitution is violated only if one branch of government or its members exercises power belonging to either of the others.” State in Interest of A.C., 93-1125, pp. 17-18 (La.1/27/94), , on reh’g, 93-1125 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State ex rel. T.M.P. 126 So. 3d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125, pp. 9-10 (La.10/17/94), (citing La.
  • State in Interest of Cac 85 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125, pp. 9-10 (La.10/17/94), (citing La.
  • State ex rel. B.H. v. A.H. 968 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State in the Interest of AC., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94); , cert.
  • State Ex Rel. BH v. AH 968 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94); , cert.
  • Buchanan v. Langston 827 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    See State, In Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • Amin v. Bakhaty 798 So. 2d 75 La. 2001
    State in Interest of AC., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94), .
  • Amin v. Bakhaty 812 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State in Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State Ex Rel. Jb 794 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    In support, Mr. B cites State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State ex rel. J.B. 794 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    In support, Mr. B cites State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • Metro Riverboat Associates v. La. Gaming Bd. 774 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State in Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.1/27/94), , on rehearing, 93-1125 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State Ex Rel. Jk 764 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Id.; State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State in the Interest of J.K. 764 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Id.; State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State in the Interest of M.L. 761 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94); , cert.
  • State Ex Rel. Ml 761 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94); , cert.
  • State Ex Rel. RC v. Clarke 743 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • Folse v. Folse 738 So. 2d 1040 La. 1999
    9:364; In re A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94), , on reh'g, cert.
  • In Re Dantzler 739 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94); , cert.
  • In Re Leitch 732 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    See also, State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94), (on rehearing).
  • Folse v. Folse 714 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Sandifer 679 So. 2d 1324 La. 1996
  • Matter of Angus Chemical Co. 679 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Bourque v. Bouillion 663 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    10/17/94), , in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a father may not be stripped of his parental rights as a result of his sexual abuse of his child unless the sexual abuse is proved by clear and convincing evidence.
  • Bruscato v. Avant 660 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    State in the Interest of A.C., 93-1125 (La.10/17/94), (on rehearing).
  • In the Matter of R.E. 645 So. 2d 205 La. 1994
    1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982); State in the Interest of A.C., and that due process may require that no person shall lose such a fully established right unless the state has borne the burden of producing the evidence and convincing the fact finder that the essential elements have been proved.
  • Matter of RE 645 So. 2d 205 La. 1994
    1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982); State in the Interest of A.C., and that due process may require that no person shall lose such a fully established right unless the state has borne the burden of producing the evidence and convincing the fact finder that the essential elements have been proved.