Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State in Interest of AG, 630 So. 2d 909.

28 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana in the Interest of A.P. Vs. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    App. 4 Cir. 12/16/09), citing, State in the Interest of A.G., (La.
  • In re State in Interest of W.A.P. 274 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State ex rel. D.S. 255 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State ex rel. W.V. 246 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State ex rel. P.M. 186 So. 3d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    App. 5th Cir.1993); State in the Interest of A.G., ; 910 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. A.J. 151 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 5/30/12), (citing State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State ex rel. K.M. 146 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State in the Interest of AG., (La.App.
  • State ex rel. X.F. 143 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 6/6/12), (quoting State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State ex rel. S.J. 129 So. 3d 676 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 12/16/09), , 528, citing, State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State ex rel. Q.T. 100 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The standard for the State’s burden of proof in a juvenile delinquency proceeding is “no less strenuous then the standard of proof required in a criminal proceeding against an adult.” State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State ex rel. J.W. 95 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The standard for the State’s burden of proof in a juvenile delinquency proceeding is “no less strenuous than the standard of proof required in a criminal proceeding against an adult.” State in the Interest of AG., (La.App.
  • State ex rel. J.W. 95 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The standard for the State’s burden of proof in a juvenile delinquency proceeding is “no less strenuous than the standard of proof required in a criminal proceeding against an adult.” State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State ex rel. R.L. 95 So. 3d 1147 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
    The standard for the State’s burden of proof in a juvenile delinquency proceeding is “no less strenuous than the standard of proof required in a criminal proceeding against an adult.” State in the Interest of AG., (La.App.
  • State ex rel. J.T. 94 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 2/16/11), ; State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State ex rel. T.M. 88 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State ex rel. K.G. 88 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 2/16/11), , 1262; State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State in Interest of Te 85 So. 3d 270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 4/14/93), ); State in the Interest of A.G., (La.
  • State ex rel. A.H. 80 So. 3d 1203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
    The standard for the State’s burden of proof in a juvenile delinquency proceeding is “no less strenuous then the standard of proof required in a criminal proceeding against an adult.” State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State ex rel. C.D. 69 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
    The standard for the State’s burden of proof in a juvenile delinquency proceeding is “no less strenuous than the standard of proof required in a criminal proceeding against an adult.” State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State ex rel. A.H. 65 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
    The standard for the State’s burden of proof in a juvenile delinquency proceeding is “no less strenuous than the standard of proof required in a criminal proceeding against an adult.” State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Ah 65 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
    State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Tc 60 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 4/14/93), ; State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State ex rel. T.C. 60 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 4/14/93), ; State in the Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Cb 28 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
  • State ex rel. C.B. 28 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
  • State v. Fields 801 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State In Interest of A.G., (La.App.
  • State v. Piker 788 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State of Louisiana In Interest of A.G., R.N., (La.App.
  • State, in Interest of Hn 717 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    State in Interest of A.G., (La.