Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Dowling, 633 So. 2d 846.
-
Burnett v. Full Force Staffing, LLC
257 So. 3d 835
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Succession of Dowling , , 855 (La.
- Succession of Jacob Bordelon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- Succession of Bordelon 149 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
Howard v. Adm'rs of Tulane Educ. Fund
970 So. 2d 21
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 2/25/94) , ; Succession of Czindula, 99-1686 (La.App.
-
Cls v. Gjs
953 So. 2d 1025
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 2/25/94) , , this Court stated that "[t]o prove a matter by `clear and convincing' evidence means to demonstrate that the existence of a disputed fact is highly probable, that is, much more probable than its nonexistence."
- Successions of Tanner 836 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Cupples v. Pruitt 754 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
In Re Succession of Deshotels
735 So. 2d 826
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 2/25/94); (emphasis added).
- Succession of Reeves 704 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
-
McGaughey v. City of New Orleans
695 So. 2d 1109
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
4 Cir. 2/25/94) ; , wherein this court stated: Proof by "clear and convincing" evidence requires more than a "preponderance of the evidence", the traditional measure of persuasion, but less than "beyond a reasonable doubt", the stringent criminal standard.
-
Succession of Horrell
680 So. 2d 725
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
4 Cir. 2/25/94) , (citation omitted).
- Succession of Dodson 669 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
-
Succession of Anderson
656 So. 2d 42
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
App. 4th Cir. 02/25/94), .
- Succession of Christensen 649 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Succession of Braud 646 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994