DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roque v. Tate, 631 So. 2d 1385.

14 citing documents.

  • Volpe v. Volpe 265 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    (A mortgage payment is not an expense within the meaning of Article 806, but is a non-possessory right created over property to secure the performance of an obligation.); see also, , 1386 (La.App.
  • Jackson v. Morton 262 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 5 Cir. 2/9/94), , 1386.
  • Lee O. Esprit v. Coretta Lynn Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 2/9/94), where former spouses sought a credit or reimbursement for community mortgage payments pending termination of the community, and Cahill v. Kerins, 34,522 (La.App.
  • Wells v. Wells 109 So. 3d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 2/9/94) , , writ not considered, 94-0625 (La.4/29/94), .
  • Benoit v. Benoit 91 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5th Cir.2/9/94), , writ not considered, 94-0625 (La.4/29/94), ; see also La.
  • Diane M. Sheridon, Born Richard v. Jonathan Sheridon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 2/9/94), Cahill v. Kerins, 34,522 (La.App.
  • Sheridon v. Sheridon 867 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 2/9/94) , ; Cahill v. Kerins, 34,522 (La.App.
  • Lupberger v. Lupberger 805 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 2/9/94) , , our colleagues in the Fifth Circuit addressed the applicability of article 806 to a situation similar to the one we are faced with in the instant case.
  • Cahill v. Kerins 784 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    App. 5th Cir.2/9/94), , writ *691 not considered, 94-0625 (La.4/29/94), , Ms. Rogue filed an action to partition community property after termination of the community property regime.
  • Explained Roger v. Roger 751 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    5 Cir. 2/9/94) , , writ not considered, 94-625 (La.4/29/94), .
  • Kline v. Kline 741 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • Young v. Smith 715 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    5th Cir. 2/9/94), , writ not considered 94-0625 (La.4/29/94), .
  • McCarroll v. McCarroll 680 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    5th Cir. 2/9/94), , writ not considered, 94-0625 (La.
  • Bodenheimer v. Freitag 651 So. 2d 251 La. 1995
    See La.Civ.Code art. 2365 (West 1985 & Supp. 1994); (La.Ct.