Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wiedeman v. Dixie Elec. Membership Corp., 627 So. 2d 170.

29 citing documents.

Long v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 916 So. 2d 87 La. 2005
Long v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 916 So. 2d 87 La. 2005
Membership Corp., was cited as an example of the misinterpretation of § 409 which the 1995 amendment was supposed to clarify.
Long v. STATE, DOTD 862 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Ratliff v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 844 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See Reichert v. State Department of Transportation and Development, 96-1419 (La.5/20/97), ; cert.
Palacios v. LOUISIANA AND DELTA RAILROAD, INC. 775 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Dowell v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 750 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Dowell v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 750 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Ditch v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 745 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
The Court is particularly puz *1288 zled by the introduction of the reports in view of the State’s own Motion in Li-mine to exclude this type of evidence as impermissible under 23 USC 409, a Wiedeman v. Dixie Electric Membership Corporation, 93-CC1314, 93-CC1318, 93-CC1352 (La.11/29/93), ; and Reichert v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 96-C-1419, 96-C-1460, (La.5/20/97), .
Sevario v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. 752 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Long v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 743 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
the supreme court stated: Despite the State's substantial interest, Sec.
Palacios v. Louisiana and Delta RR Inc. 740 So. 2d 95 La. 1999
Membership Corp., 93-1314 (La.11/29/93), , [3] and Miguez v. Southern Pacific Transp.
Palacios v. Louisiana and Delta Railroad, Inc. 721 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Fry v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 715 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
In an earlier decision, the supreme court held that items considered inadmissible and undiscoverable under this provision include: surveys to identify hazardous railroad crossings and improve them; applications for federal assistance in replacing or rehabilitating highway bridges; studies assigning priorities and schedules of proj
Cambre v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. 705 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Reichert v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Development 694 So. 2d 193 La. 1997
Hardenstein v. COOK CONST. INC. 691 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Palacios v. LOUISIANA AND DELTA RR INC. 682 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Reichert v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 674 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Reichert v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 674 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Reichert v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 667 So. 2d 542 La. 1996
section 409 and this court’s
Reichert v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 667 So. 2d 542 La. 1996
Archon v. Union Pacific RR 657 So. 2d 987 La. 1995
Doucet v. Champagne 657 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Reichert v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 656 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Miguez v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 645 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
/s/ Allen Babineaux DISTRICT JUDGE" After judgment was rendered on the motion in limine, cert.
Beecher v. Keel 645 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Stephens v. Town of Jonesboro 642 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Soileau v. Southern Pacific RR 640 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
This obvious mixing and mingling of issues, I
Rick v. STATE, DOTD 630 So. 2d 1271 La. 1994
§ 409 was in accord with this Court's subsequent opinion in Wiedeman v. Dixie Electric Membership Corp., et al