DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Montalvo v. Sondes, 637 So. 2d 127.

177 citing documents.

  • Mauberret-Lavie v. Lavie 850 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    In Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813, p. 4 (La.5/23/94), , our Supreme Court stated that an attorney does not owe a legal duty to his client's adversary when acting in his client's behalf.
  • Lentini v. NLLS 841 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    art. 931; Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), .
  • Ford New Holland Credit Co. v. McManus 833 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    art. 93 1; Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.05/23/94), ; Robinson v. North American Royalties, Inc., Arledge v. Hendricks, 30,588 (La.App.2d Cir.06/26/98), , writ denied, 98-2015 (La.11/20/98), .
  • Ezell v. Dyess 831 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    In Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), , a case decided approximately five years after Penalber, the Louisiana Supreme Court further explained: Of course, identifying an intentional tort in the context of an attorney's actions may be more difficult than identifying a traditional intentional tort....
  • MacK v. Evans 804 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    art. 931; Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.05/23/94), .
  • Rogers v. Ash Grove Cement Co. 799 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), .
  • Fasullo v. Finley 782 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • Farmco Inc. v. West Baton Rouge Parish Governing Council 808 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813, p. 6 (La.5/23/94), .
  • Frazer v. Bruscato 772 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    In Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), , the Supreme Court stated, “Moreover, federal courts interpreting Fed.
  • Sommer v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. DEVELOPMENT 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    The issue, according to the Louisiana Supreme Court's holding in Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), , is whether plaintiff shows an intent on the part of the attorney to cause direct harm to her.
  • Washington v. Falco S & D, Inc. 762 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    art. 854, official revision comment (a); Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813, p.6 (La.5/23/94), .
  • Sommer v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    The issue, according to the Louisiana Supreme Court’s holding in Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), , is whether plaintiff shows an intent on the part of the attorney to cause direct harm to her.
  • Henican v. Hackett 734 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    However, and Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), , which prohibits a plaintiffs suit against his adversary’s attorney until after termination of the underlying suit in favor of the plaintiff.
  • DESIRE NARCOTICS REHAB. CENTER v. White 732 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    The Supreme Court simply restated the basic holding of Penalber in its later decision in Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), , which also is cited by the appellants.
  • Milling, Benson, Woodward, Hillyer, Pierson & Miller L.L.P. v. American Marine Holding Co. 729 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), .
  • Arledge v. Hendricks 715 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    art. 931; Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), .
  • Squyres v. NATIONWIDE HOUSING SYSTEMS 715 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    5/23/94); , Louisiana retains a system of fact pleading.
  • Devers v. Southern University 712 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    art. 931; Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813, pp. 5-6 (La.5/23/94); .
  • Walters v. Rubicon Inc. 706 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    art. 931; Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813, pp. 5, 6 (La.5/23/94)
  • Blessing v. Rodrigue 703 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    art. 931; Montalvo v. Sondes, No. 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Connelly v. Lee 699 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    [2] The Supreme Court subsequently reaffirmed Penalber in Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94); .
  • Ulmer v. Frisard 694 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    In Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), , the Supreme Court observed that identifying an intentional tort in the context of an attorney’s actions may be more difficult than identifying a traditional intentional tort.
  • Hays v. Hansen 692 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    See Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), , (La.App.
  • Cowen v. Steiner 689 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), .
  • Goodman v. Spillers 686 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • Joyner v. Wear 665 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Southland Truck Center, Inc. v. Bank of Sunset & Trust Co. 651 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    5/23/94); , Louisiana retains a system of fact pleading.