DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite SOUTH CENT. TEL. CO. v. Ka-Jon Food Stores, 644 So. 2d 368.

8 citing documents.

  • Gaylord Container Corporation v. CNA Ins. Companies 807 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    During all pretrial proceedings and throughout the bench trial, the parties and the trial court presumed the Louisiana Supreme Court's opinion in South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Ka-Jon Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., 93-2926 (La.5/24/94), , vacated on other grounds, 93-2926 (La.9/15/94), , was the operative law.
  • Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp. 774 So. 2d 119 La. 2000
    In South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Ka-Jon Food Stores, Inc., 93-2926, p. 1 (La.5/24/94), , vacated on other grounds, (La.9/15/94), , an underground gas tank at the Ka-Jon convenience store leaked and caused damage to subsurface telephone cables owned by South Central Bell.
  • Distinguished Tippett v. Padre Refining Co. 771 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Ka-Jon Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., 93-2926 (La.9/15/94), ; Ducote, supra .
  • Ducote v. Koch Pipeline Co., LP 730 So. 2d 432 La. 1999
    I find no reason to stray from this Court's previous reasoning in South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Ka-Jon Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., , vacated and remanded, (vacated and remanded for evidentiary hearings on whether the pollution exclusion clause at issue was actually a policy endorsement).
  • Distinguished Ducote v. Koch Pipeline Co. 709 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    First Financial directs our attention to the fact that the total pollution exclusion is the industry’s third attempt to change the policy language and that, other than in the withdrawn case of South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Ka-Jon Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc., 93-2926 (La.5/24/94); , rehearing granted (La.6/24/94), judgment vacated, 93-2926 (La.9/15/94); , it has not been interpreted.
  • Hinds v. Clean Land Air Water Corp. 693 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Co. v. Ka-Jon Food Stores of Louisiana, 93-2926 (La.9/15/94); .
  • Sandbom v. BASF Wyandotte Corp. 674 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Oaks v. Dupuy 653 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    09/15/94), ; Benton Casing Serv., Inc. v. Avemco Ins.