Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 637 So. 2d 1033.

21 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Robert H. Miller, III A/K/A Robert Miller, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Jason Ray Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
p. 3 (La.6/3/94), -35, the supreme court discussed the amendment of bills of information as follows: La.
State of Louisiana v. Terry James Goodeaux -Aka- Terry Goodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
6/3/94), -35, as follows: La.
State v. Johnson 196 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Johnson, 93-0394 (La.6/3/94), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/14/09), , writ denied, 2009-0310 (La.
State v. Wallace 143 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In State v. Johnson, 93-0394 (La.6/3/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed a conviction wherein the trial court charged the jury on distribution of counterfeit cocaine when the defendant was charged by bill of information with possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute.
State of Louisiana v. Kent Dale Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/3/94), -35, the supreme court discussed the amendment of bills of information as follows: La.Const.1974, Art. I, § 13 provides that “[i]n a criminal prosecution,anaccusedshalbeinformedofthenatureandcauseoftheaccusationagainsthim.” Thisrequirementprotectstheaccused’sright to prepare a defense
State v. Simon 62 So. 3d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
p. 3 (La.6/3/94), -35 , the supreme court discussed the amendment of bills of information as follows: La.
State v. MUMME 29 So. 3d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Const.1974, Art. I, § 13 provides that “[i]n a criminal prosecution, an accused shall be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him.” The Louisiana Supreme has stated, “[t]his requirement protects the accused’s right to prepare a defense and exercise fully his rights of confrontation and cross-examination.” State v. Johnson, 93-0394, p. 3 (La.6/3/94), (citation omitted).
State v. Lewis 28 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Thus, in State v. Johnson, 93-0394, p. 3 (La.6/3/94), -1035 (per curiam) the Court held: Accordingly, the state may not substantially amend the bill of information to charge a new offense once trial has begun.
State v. Dotie 1 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Const. Art. 1, § 13; State v. Johnson, 93-0394 (La.6/3/94), .
State v. Moliere 931 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
The Wheeler court was following the Supreme Court precedent set in State v. Johnson, 93-0394 (La.6/3/94); .
State v. Ceaser 859 So. 2d 639 La. 2003
State v. Johnson, 93-0394 (La.6/3/94), -35 .
State v. Gardner 844 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
See State v. Johnson, 93-0394 (La.6/3/94), -35 .
State v. Delandro 818 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In State v. Johnson, 93-0394, p. 3 (La.6/3/94), -1035 (per curiam), the Supreme Court set out the law on the amendment of a bill of information: La.
State v. Thompson 781 So. 2d 1221 La. 2001
Const. art. I, § 13; State v. Johnson, 93-0394, p. 3 (La.6/3/94), -35 .
State v. Schleve 775 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See State v. Johnson, 93-0394 (La.6/3/94), -35 .
State v. Stephenson 766 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
In State v. Johnson, 93-0394 (La.6/3/94), , the supreme court set out the law on the amendment of a bill of information: La.
State v. Gilbert 760 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
NOTES [1] State v. Johnson, 93-0394 (La.6/3/94), .
State v. R.W. 721 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
cites State v. Johnson, 93-0394 (La.6/3/94), , in support of his argument.
State v. Ignot 701 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
6/3/94), , the supreme court set out the law on the amendment of a bill of information: La.
State v. Wheeler 665 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995