DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 639 So. 2d 237.

163 citing documents.

  • State v. Scott 669 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Cook 664 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    In State v. Smith, 94-402 (La.7/5/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court established the process of appellate review of the trial court's sentencing process: (1) While a trial judge must consider guidelines, he has complete discretion to reject the guidelines and impose any sentence which is not constitutionally excessive, but is within the statutory sentencin
  • State v. Black 669 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    7/5/94), , a trial judge, having properly considered the guidelines, has complete discretion to reject them and impose any sentence which is not constitutionally excessive, provided the trial court states for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the sentence imposed.
  • State v. Calhoun 669 So. 2d 1359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    7/5/94), (on rehearing) (footnote omitted).
  • State v. Calhoun 669 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    7/5/94), (on rehearing) (footnote omitted).
  • State v. Lacey 669 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. James 670 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Williams 670 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Green 666 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    7/5/94), (on rehearing).
  • State v. Woodman 666 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Adams 666 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    7/7/94), ; State v. Tuttle, 26,307 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94), ; State v. Tum-blin, 27,122 (La.App.2d Cir. 6/21/95), .
  • State v. Famous 667 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    07/05/94), (on rehearing).
  • State v. Meche 664 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Smith, 93—402 (La.7/5/94); , 240 discussed the process of appellate review of a trial court’s sentencing process and held that: (1) [Wjhile a trial judge must consider the Guidelines, he has complete discretion to reject the Guidelines and impose any sentence which is not constitutionally excessive, but is within the statutory sentencing range
  • State v. Clements 665 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    *139 In State v. Smith, 93-0402 (La.7/5/94); , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that: ...
  • State v. Guzman 665 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: (1) [W]hile a trial judge must consider the Guidelines, he has complete discretion to reject the Guidelines and impose any sentence which is not constitutionally excessive, [footnote omitted] but is within the statutory sentencing range for the crime of which a defendant has
  • State v. O'Neal 665 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), (on rehearing) (footnote omitted).
  • State v. Lewis 665 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), (on rehearing) the Supreme Court outlined how the sentencing guidelines affect the trial judge's sentencing discretion: [W]hile a trial judge must consider the Guidelines, he has complete discretion to reject the Guidelines and impose any sentence which is not constitutionally excessive, [footnote omitted] but is
  • State v. Washington 662 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    07/05/94), ; State v. Tuttle, 26,307-08 (La.App.2d Cir. 09/21/94), .
  • State v. Fontenot 664 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    7/5/94); , the supreme court set forth the process of appellate review of a trial court's use of the guidelines.
  • State v. Thomas 662 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), (on rehearing).
  • State v. Johnson 671 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), (on rehearing) (footnote omitted).
  • State v. Robertson 671 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    The Supreme Court, in State v. Smith, 93-0402 (La.7/5/94), (on rehearing), held that mechanical compliance with the guidelines did not end appellate inquiry into the constitutional excessiveness of a sentence imposed by a trial court.
  • State v. Hines 663 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Spencer 663 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Taylor 662 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that: (1) while a trial judge must consider the Guidelines, he has complete discretion to reject the Guidelines and impose any sentence which is not constitutionally excessive, but is within the statutory sentencing range for the crime of which a defendant has been convicted, so
  • State v. Coates 661 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    7/4/94) (on rehearing), .
  • State v. Evans 661 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    07/05/94), , a trial judge, having properly considered the guidelines, has complete discretion to reject the guidelines and impose any sentence which is not constitutionally excessive, provided the trial court states for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the imposition of sentence.
  • State v. Devoil 661 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Mobley 661 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    7/05/94), ; State v. Farley, 26,-377 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94), ; State v. Walters, 26,647 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/07/94), .
  • State v. Tatum 661 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    07/05/94), ; State v. Tuttle, 26,307 (La.App.
  • State v. Lennon 661 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Brown 660 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), ; State v. Farley, 26,377 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94), ; State v. Walters, 26,647 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/7/94), .
  • State v. Bordenave 660 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), ; State v. Coleman, 94-0666 (La.App.
  • State v. Sanford 660 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), (on rehearing).
  • State v. Wilson 660 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Young 660 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Johnson 659 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Jackson 658 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Tumblin 658 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    7/05/94), ; State v. Tuttle, 26,307 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94), .
  • State v. Golson 658 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Payne 657 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Jones 657 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    7/5/94); , the supreme court established the process of appellate review of a trial court’s use of the Louisiana Felony Sentencing Guidelines.
  • State v. Richard 657 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: (1) [W]hile a trial judge must consider the Guidelines, he has complete discretion to reject the guidelines and impose any sentence which is not constitutionally excessive, but is within the statutory sentencing range for the crime of which a defendant has been convicted, so long
  • State v. Sepulvado 655 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    State v. Smith, 93-0402 (La.1994), .
  • State v. Williams 655 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), (on rehearing).
  • State v. Leonard 655 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), ; State v. Farley, 26377 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94), ; State v. Walters, 26647 (La.
  • State v. Walters 655 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), , a trial judge, having properly considered the guidelines, has the complete discretion to reject the guidelines and impose any sentence which is not constitutionally excessive, provided the trial court states for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the imposition of sentence.
  • State v. Walters 655 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    7/5/94), , a trial judge, having properly considered the guidelines, has the complete discretion to reject the guidelines and impose any sentence which is not constitutionally excessive, provided the trial court states for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis for the imposition of sentence.
  • State v. Manuel 657 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Holleman 657 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    7/5/94); , the Louisiana Supreme Court held: (1) while a trial judge must consider the Guidelines, he has complete discretion to reject the Guidelines and impose | sany sentence which is not constitutionally excessive, but is within the statutory sentencing range for the crime of which a defendant has been convicted, so l