Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hillman, 617 So. 2d 1181.

30 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Cooper, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State v. Duhon 270 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 3rd Cir.), writ denied , (La.
State v. Brooks 258 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3 Cir.), writ denied , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Francisco Jesus Vasquez-Ramirez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir.), writ denied, this court addressed the defendant‟s claim that the trial court erred in interrupting his cross-examination of the victim.
State v. Vasquez-Ramirez 210 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir.), writ denied, this court addressed the defendant’s claim that the trial court erred in interrupting his cross-examination of the victim.
State v. Elkins 138 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
3 Cir.), writ denied, (1993).
State of Louisiana v. A.B.M., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. A.B.M. 52 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Patrick Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Thomas 7 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Derrick Baker, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Baker 986 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Juan R. Vidaurri La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir.), writ denied, this court stated: [T]he purpose of the testimony of the expert witness is to provide a basis of knowledge, and background information on a subject.
State v. Vidaurri 919 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir.), writ denied, this court stated: [T]he purpose of the testimony of the expert witness is to provide a basis of knowledge, and background information on a subject.
State of Louisiana v. Theddeus Rideaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Rideaux 916 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Burks 905 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
3 Cir.1993), writ denied, the Third Circuit concluded that the fact the victim told the witness "the details of the defendant's acts of molestation over a period of time, rather than all at once does not remove the [witness' testimony] from the provisions of La.C.E.
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Glenn Teague La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Teague 893 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Ellis 880 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
3d Cir.1993), writ denied, (mother's boyfriend); State v. Dillion, 99-2175 (La.App.
State v. Schmidt 771 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
State v. Mickens 731 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
3d Cir.), writ denied, (1993); see also, State v. Sturdivant, 27,680 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), .
Jacques v. Moses 737 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
State ex rel. M.V. 741 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Shirah 702 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Handley 686 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
3rd Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
State v. Piazza 655 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
3rd Cir.), writ denied, (which recognizes that the trier of fact retains the right to accept or reject the conclusions of an expert witness.)
State v. Guidry 651 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
3d Cir.1993), writ denied, (La.
State v. Trahan 637 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
3d Cir.), writ denied, the court indicated that the new sentencing guidelines should be consulted as an aid in determining if a sentence is constitutionally excessive.