Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pierre, 631 So. 2d 427.

134 citing documents.

  • State v. Haynes 762 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94)
  • State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94), .
  • State v. Bright 776 So. 2d 1134 La. 2000
    ng court to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the jury, "`the jury cannot be permitted to speculate if the evidence is such that reasonable jurors must have a reasonable doubt.'" (quoting 2 Charles Alan Wright, Federal Practice & Procedure, Criminal 2d § 467 (2d ed.1982)); see also State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94)
  • State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
  • State v. Jetton 756 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.02/03/94), .
  • State v. Webb 750 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
  • State v. Mitchell 745 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94)
  • State v. Texada 734 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94); .
  • State v. McPherson 733 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    [5] 93-0893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94), [6] 97-248, pp. 8-9 (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 735 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
  • State v. Ratcliff 731 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), .
  • State v. Herrera 729 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Cedrington 725 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), , State v. Girod, 94-853 (La.App.
  • State v. DeSilva 726 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    bln State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), , in a per curiam opinion, the Supreme Court reversed the defendant’s manslaughter conviction.
  • State v. Cayton 721 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94); .
  • State v. Anderson 707 So. 2d 1223 La. 1998
    14:24; State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94)
  • Distinguished State v. Bremer 704 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Defendant relies on State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94), , to support his position that the State cannot show specific intent.
  • State v. Graves 699 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94); .
  • State v. Anderson 691 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94); .
  • State v. Hebert 688 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.02/03/94), .
  • State v. Belino 686 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893, p. 4 (La.2/3/94), .
  • State v. Handley 686 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Bowman 677 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    2/3/94), the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the defendant's conviction.
  • State v. Jasper 677 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    02/03/94), , a recent case addressing the concept of principals.
  • State v. Shaw 672 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Wiley 672 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    2/4/94), , 428 noted in reversing a manslaughter conviction which this court had affirmed: *188 “All persons ‘concerned in the commission of a crime’ are principals, La.R.S.
  • State v. Tate 670 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    State v. Pierre, 93-0893 (La.2/3/94); .
  • State v. Chambers 666 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Collins 661 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    02/03/94), ; writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Lewis 662 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Bordenave 660 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Marshall 657 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Girod 653 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Long 643 So. 2d 132 La. 1994