Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Porter, 639 So. 2d 1137.

72 citing documents.

State v. Fuller 962 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.07/05/94), .
State of Louisiana v. Warren Todd Dossman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94), State ex rel.
State v. Dossman 940 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94), ; State ex rel.
State v. Jackson 916 So. 2d 1015 La. 2005
See State v. Porter, 93-1106, p. 5 (La.7/5/94), .
State v. Richard 902 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State *1276 v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94), .
State v. Divers 889 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94), .
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94), -42 .
State v. Harris 846 So. 2d 709 La. 2003
State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94), .
State v. Goodley 820 So. 2d 478 La. 2002
State v. Porter, 93-1106, p. 4 (La.7/5/94), ("Treating the jury's prerogative to return a responsive verdict similar to the jury's power of nullification, this Court has consistently held that the jury must be given the option to convict the defendant of the lesser offense, even though the evidence clearly and overwhelmingly supported a conviction of the
State v. Johnson 823 So. 2d 917 La. 2002
Louisiana's system of responsive verdicts has constituted a distinctive aspect of this state's law "[s]ince before the turn of the century," State v. Porter, 93-1106, p. 4, (La.7/5/94), , although it has been questioned elsewhere.
State v. Simmons 817 So. 2d 16 La. 2002
State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94), ; State ex rel.
State v. Little 814 So. 2d 547 La. 2002
See generally State v. Porter, 93-1106, pp. 4-9 (La.7/5/94), -42 (reviewing the authorities); ("Lesser and included offenses are those in which all of the essential elements of the lesser offense are also essential elements of the greater offense charged.").
State v. Sharp 810 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
In State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.07/05/94), , the court discussed the law of responsive verdicts as the statutory right to have the jury characterize a defendant's *1192 conduct as a lesser crime.
State v. Mitchell 815 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Although the evidence was arguably sufficient to support the charged offenses, see State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94); and State ex rel.
State v. Brown 788 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94), .
State v. Wilkinson 772 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
The Defendant notes that, in State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94), , the court concluded that because article 814 contains authorized responsive verdicts which are not truly lesser and included offenses, evidence which is sufficient to support a conviction of the charged offense may not support all of the elements of the responsive offense.
State v. Marts 765 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Porter, 93-1106, pp. 4-9 (La.7/5/94), -42 .
State v. King 760 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[2] For a discussion of burden of proof see, State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94)
State v. Duncan 738 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
See State v. Porter, 93-1106, p. 5 n. 6 (La.7/5/94), , 1140 n. 6.
State v. Hopkins 692 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Porter, 93-1106 (La.7/5/94); .
State v. George 661 So. 2d 975 La. 1995
State v. Guidry 649 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
stating: “Since before the turn of the century, this court has recognized that a defendant, when charged with a crime for which the Legislature had provided a responsive verdict, has the statutory right to have the jury characterize his conduct as the Ulesser crime.