State v. Stamper
State v. Stamper, 624 So. 2d 1208 (La. 1993).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana v. Eric Wayne Lemay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Isame Henry Faciane A/K/A Isame Faciance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
- State v. Jefferson 91 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
- State v. Robinson 975 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
- State v. Robinson 975 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
- State v. Houston 925 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- State v. Thibodeaux 915 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
- State v. Hall 796 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- State v. Ste. Marie 801 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
- State v. Hutcherson 785 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- State v. Manasco 782 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- State v. Appacrombie 766 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Opinion text
624 So.2d 1208 (1993) STATE of Louisiana v. Oscar J. STAMPER. No. 93-K-1169. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 24, 1993. PER CURIAM. The defendant was convicted of three counts of indecent behavior with juveniles, in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:81, and was sentenced to consecutive sentences of four years, five years, and six years. The defendant's actions constituted a common scheme or plan for which imposition of a concurrent sentence is appropriate. La.C.Cr.P. art. 883. The trial court abused its discretion in ordering consecutive sentences and this Court now orders the sentences be served concurrently. HALL and KIMBALL, JJ., dissent. CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.