Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Knapper, 626 So. 2d 395.
- State v. Hickerson 838 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Kirk 833 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Fontenot 795 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
-
State v. Randle
750 So. 2d 353
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
2501 , 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984); (La.App.
- State v. Powell 746 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
- State v. Oliver 752 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
- State v. Cook 733 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
- State v. Jones 720 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
- State v. Batiste 706 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- State v. Ballon 703 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
-
State v. Cage
696 So. 2d 270
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
We believe that the prosecution has established by the preponderance of the evidence that the evidence herein ultimately or inevitably would have been discovered; (La.App.
-
State v. Melbert
649 So. 2d 740
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
3d Cir.), writ denied, writ denied, (La.
- State v. Sterling 641 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
- State v. Pollard 640 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994