Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Scull, 639 So. 2d 1239.

39 citing documents.

  • State ex rel. K.L. 217 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 4 Cir. 6/30/94), ).
  • State v. Brock 210 So. 3d 276 La. 2017
  • State v. Ulmer 116 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 6/30/94), ; see also State v. Long 03-2592 (La.9/9/04), ; State v. Fournette, 08-0254 (La.App.
  • State v. Cunningham 88 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 6/30/94) , ; State v. Snee, 99-0257 (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 42 So. 3d 368 La. 2010
    4th Cir.6/30/94), -44 (affirming grant of motion to suppress currency retrieved from glove compartment of vehicle in which defendant was riding as a passenger after police lawfully stopped the car on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity).
  • State v. Carter 38 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State ex rel. B.C. 991 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 6/30/94), , this court stated: “The trial court is vested *577 with great discretion when ruling on motion to suppress.” See also State v. Jones, 2002-1931 (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Bc 991 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 6/30/94), , this court stated: "The trial court is vested *577 with great discretion when ruling on motion to suppress."
  • State v. Fournette 989 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. James 980 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Taylor 962 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    App. 4 Cir. 6/30/94), , this court stated: "The trial court is vested with great discretion when ruling on a motion to suppress."
  • State v. Hunter 925 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 6/30/94), , this court stated: "The trial court is vested with great discretion when ruling on motion to suppress."
  • State v. Cheatham 876 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Jones 832 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 6/30/94), , this court stated: "The trial court is vested with great discretion when ruling on motion to suppress."
  • State v. Lewis 828 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Sears 823 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Dobard 824 So. 2d 1127 La. 2002
    4 Cir. 6/30/94) , ; writ denied, 94-2058 (La.11/11/94), .
  • State v. Corzo 811 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 6/30/94) , the police received a tip that “Raul,” a Hispanic male, routinely traveled to Florida to pick up cocaine.
  • State v. Harris 800 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Briley 798 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 6/30/94), : "The trial court is vested with great discretion when ruling on motion to suppress."
  • State v. Allen 792 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Conaler 790 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Lewis 782 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 6/30/94) , , writ denied 94-2058 (La.11/11/94) .
  • State v. Muse 772 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 6/30/94) , , writ denied 94-2058 (La.11/11/94), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 772 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 6/30/94) ; , writ denied, 94-2058 (La.11/11/94); , a reliable confidential informant told police that "Raul" imported cocaine from Florida, stored it at a Bruxelles Street apartment, and sold it from a Lafitte Street address.
  • State v. Hayden 767 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 6/30/94) ; , writ denied 94-2058 (La.11/11/94); .
  • State v. Thomas 764 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 6/30/94) ; , writ denied, 94-2058 (La.11/11/94); , a reliable confidential informant told police that "Raul" imported cocaine from Florida, stored it at a Bruxelles Street apartment, and sold it from a Lafitte Street address.
  • State v. Shortridge 750 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 6/30/94), , writ denied 94-2058 (La.11/11/94), , this court discussed "good faith": In Leon , the Court noted that evidence seized pursuant to a warrant for which there was no probable cause to support it need not be suppressed if the officers who executed the warrant believed the warrant was validly issued.
  • State v. Robinson 743 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Oliver 752 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 6/30/94) , , 1245 writ denied, 94-2058 (La.11/11/94), .
  • State v. Hoffpauir 731 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 6/30/94), [3] , this court discussed "good faith": In Leon , the Court noted that evidence seized pursuant to a warrant for which there was no probable cause to support it need not be suppressed if the officers who executed the warrant believed the warrant was validly issued.
  • State v. Dappemont 734 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Smiley 729 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    App. 4 Cir. 6/30/94), , writ denied 94-2058 (La.11/11/94), : "The trial court is vested with great discretion when ruling on motion to suppress."
  • State v. Harris 727 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 6/30/94) , , writ den.
  • State v. Dillon 719 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    4 Cir. 6/30/94) , , writ denied 94-2058 (La.11/11/94), , this court invalidated a search of a car’s glove compartment during an investigatory stop.
  • State v. Hill 700 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4th Cir. 6/30/94), [6] : "The trial court is vested with great discretion when ruling on motion to suppress."
  • State v. Anderson 696 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4th Cir. 6/30/94), [3] : "The trial court is vested with great discretion when ruling on motion to suppress."
  • State v. Wimberly 678 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    4 Cir. 6/30/94) , , writ den.
  • State v. Williams 665 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    4th Cir. 6/30/94), [3] : "The trial court is vested with great discretion when ruling on motion to suppress."