Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sanders, 648 So. 2d 1272.

168 citing documents.

State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
824, 828 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 25 (La.11/30/94), .
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
ndant shot and killed his estranged wife and the three men who were with her at the time); State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), (defendant murdered his estranged girlfriend and severely wounded her mother); State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), (ex-employee returns to restaurant, kills one employee and attempts to kill another); State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), (husband kills estranged wife and new boyfriend); (murder of two children in an apartment defendants intended to burglarize).
State v. Moton 73 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
494 , 169 L.Ed.2d 346 (2007); State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State v. Parker 76 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 18-19 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Mary Henderson Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Trahan 69 So. 3d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The standard by which this Court determines whether improper closing argument constitutes reversible error is whether it is “firmly convinced that the jury was influenced by the remarks and that they contributed to the verdict.” State v. Sanders, 93-0001 p. 16-17 (La.11/30/94), -86 , cert.
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
1070 , 140 L.Ed.2d 129 (1998); State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 25 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Sherri Ann Sepulvado La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 9 (La.11/30/94), cert.
State v. Sepulvado 59 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 9 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State v. Ford 57 So. 3d 297 La. 2011
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, pp. 25-26 (La.11/30/94)
State v. Burns 48 So. 3d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 14 (La.11/20/94), .
State v. Dunn 41 So. 3d 454 La. 2010
ndant shot and killed his estranged wife and the three men who were with her at the time); State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), (defendant murdered his estranged girlfriend and severely wounded her mother); State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), (ex-employee returns to restaurant, kills one employee and attempts to kill another); State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), (husband kills estranged wife and new boyfriend); (murder of two children in an apartment defendants intended to burglarize).
State of Louisiana v. Wendell Bourque La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, pp. 20-21 (La.11/30/94), -89
State v. Bourque 33 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, pp. 20-21 (La.11/30/94), -89
State v. Ridgley 7 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 14 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
162 , 136 L.Ed.2d 106 (1996) (ex-employee returned to restaurant, killed one employee and attempted to kill another); State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993); State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 25 (La.11/30/94), .
State v. Gage 965 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
162 , 136 L.Ed.2d 106 (1996), State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jason Lee Short La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), Wingo, 457 So.2d at 1166.
State v. Short 958 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), ; Wingo, 457 So.2d at 1166 .
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 14 (La.11/30/94), ( )
State of Louisiana v. Willard Brandenburg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Wessinger, 98-1234 at p. 24, 736 So.2d at 183; State v. Sanders, 93-0001, pp. 20-21 (La.11/30/94)
State v. Brandenburg 949 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Wessinger, 98-1234 at p. 24, 736 So.2d at 183; State v. Sanders, 93-0001, pp. 20-21 (La.11/30/94)
State v. Batiste 947 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
*815 State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 18-19 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State v. LeBoeuf 943 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
2078, 2081 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993); State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 17 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State v. Leonard 932 So. 2d 660 La. 2006
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, pp. 20-21 (La.11/30/94), -89
State of Louisiana v. Larry Surratt and Cynthia Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Wessinger, 98-1234 at p. 24, 736 So.2d at 183; State v. Sanders, 93-[1] pp. 20-21 (La.11/30/94)
State v. Surratt 932 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Wessinger, 98-1234 at p. 24, 736 So.2d at 183; State v. Sanders, 93-[1] pp. 20-21 (La.11/30/94)
State v. Davis 930 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Everidge, 96-2665 (La.12/2/97), ; State v. Sanders, 93-0001(La.11/20/94), .
State v. Moses 932 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
[3] Compare State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), , where the Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized that courts should "look through the caption of pleadings in order to ascertain their substance and to do substantial justice .
State of Louisiana v. Nicholas Demond Pitree La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Pitree 930 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Sanders, 93-01, p. 13 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State v. Shank 924 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
[21] 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), -1283 , cert.
State v. Broadway 920 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
P. art. 703 D; State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), .
State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, pp. 20-21 (La.11/30/94), -89 ; cert.
State v. Williams 925 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, pp. 18-19 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State v. Price 917 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Carmouche, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), .
State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
(La.12/12/97), (defendant shot and killed his estranged wife and the three men who were with her); State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), (ex-employee returns to restaurant, kills one employee and attempts to kill another); State v. Tart, supra (defendant murdered an elderly couple during an aggravated burglary, armed robbery); State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), (husband kills estranged wife and new boyfriend); (murder of two children in an apartment that defendant intended to burglarize).
State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The standard by which this Court determines whether improper closing argument constitutes reversible error is whether it is “firmly convinced that the jury was influenced by the remarks and that they contributed to the verdict.” State v. Sanders, 93-0001 p. 16-17 (La.11/30/94), -86, cert.
State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Sanders, 93-0001 p. 16-17 (La.11/30/94), -86 , cert.
State v. Harris 892 So. 2d 1238 La. 2005
Taylor , 93-2201 p. 19, 669 So.2d at 374 ; State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State v. Pitre 901 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 9 (La.11/30/94), , cert.
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94), -89 , cert.
State of Louisiana v. William L. Giles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, pp. 20-21 (La.11/30/94), -89
State v. Giles 884 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Sanders, 93-0001, pp. 20-21 (La.11/30/94), -89
State of Louisiana v. Daniel Pickett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
11/30/94), -1287; -1385 (La.1993).
State v. Pickett 878 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Deal, supra (expert's "testimony regarding the defendant's intent was merely stating the obvious"); (emphasis in original); State v. Sanders, 93-0001, p. 18 (La.11/30/94), -1287 ; -1385 (La.1993).
State of Louisiana v. Gary Dewayne Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Regarding the scope of our review of trial court rulings on motions for mistrial, a “[m]istrial is a drastic remedy generally and the determination ‘of whether prejudice has resulted lies in the sound discretion of the trial judge.’ ” State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97); (quoting State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94); cert.
State v. Hamilton 867 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
a.2/11/00), , this court stated: 11sRegarding the scope of our review of trial court rulings on motions for mistrial, a “[mjistrial is a drastic remedy generally and the determination ‘of whether prejudice has resulted lies in the sound discretion of the trial judge.’ ” State v. Banks, 96-2227, p. 2 (La.4/18/97); (quoting State v. Sanders, 93-0001 (La.11/30/94); , cert.