Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Martin, 645 So. 2d 190.

180 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. William Odell Cash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    10/17/94), (citation omitted).
  • State v. Cash 861 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 12 (La.10/17/94), (citation omitted).
  • State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
    See Wessinger, 98-1234 at p. 46, 736 So.2d at 196 ; State v. Roy , 95-0638 at pp. 19-20, 681 So.2d at 1242 ; State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 20 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Amin 839 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State v. Wright 834 So. 2d 974 La. 2002
    (Emphasis added) [13] Cf. State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94); , cert.
  • State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
    State v. Koon, 96-1208, p. 34 (La.5/20/97), ( orig.hrg ); State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), , 532 n. 8, citing State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 14 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Louviere 833 So. 2d 885 La. 2002
    [24] See, e.g., State v. Connolly, 96-1680 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), ; cert.
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
    [31] See State v. Martin, 93-0285 at p. 18 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State v. Plaisance 811 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    In State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , the court discussed the corroboration rule: Under the Louisiana corpus delicti rule, an accused cannot be convicted on his own uncorroborated confession without proof that a crime has been committed by someone.
  • State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Porter 806 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Chattman 800 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Koon, 96-1208, p. 34 (La.5/20/97), ; State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 14 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Duncan 802 So. 2d 533 La. 2001
    [30] See, e.g., State v. Connolly, 96-1680 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), ; cert.
  • State v. Morgan 791 So. 2d 100 La. 2001
    State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 12 (La.10/17/94), (citation omitted).
  • State v. Oxley 802 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 11/3/99) ; , citing State v. Martin, 93-285, p. 7 (La.10/17/94); .
  • State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
    See State v. Roy, 95-0638, pp. 19-20 (La.10/4/96), (citing State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), ).
  • State v. Broaden 780 So. 2d 349 La. 2001
    State v. Koon, 96-1208, p. 34 (La.5/20/97), ; State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 14 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Porche 780 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94); .
  • State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
    1169 , 140 L.Ed.2d 179 (1998); State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State v. Lormand 771 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    The supreme court in State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 14 (La.10/17/94); , cert.
  • State v. Schmidt 771 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    (evidence of heroin addiction inadmissible to show the motive for armed robbery); see also State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), (evidence that defendant told four people that he had killed the decedent because she accused him of raping her after they had sexual intercourse was admissible to show his motive to commit murder).
  • State v. Vernon 765 So. 2d 321 La. 2000
    See State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 13 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Sam 761 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
    State v. Koon, 96-1208, p. 34 (La.5/20/97), (orig.hrg); State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), n. 8 , citing State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 14 (La.10/17/94), ; cert.
  • State v. Branch 759 So. 2d 31 La. 2000
    Although Dr. Richoux did not give the details of respondent's statements, he considered them a reliable basis for diagnostic purposes because "the circumstances, as we appreciated them, were consistent with what he told us." See State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 7 (La.10/17/94), ("The touchstone [of a statement's admissibility] is trustworthiness—an untrustworthy confession should not alone support a conviction, and corroboration is an effective test of the trustworthiness of a person's inculpatory s
  • State v. Lane 755 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Burns 750 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State v. Casey 775 So. 2d 1022 La. 2000
    See State v. Martin, 93-0285, p. 17 (La.10/17/94), ; (La.
  • State v. Hobley 752 So. 2d 771 La. 1999
    92-3331, p. 19 n. 19, 648 So.2d at 376 n. 19 (citing State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), ; (La.
  • State v. Gaspard 746 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    The corpus delicti rule was reviewed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Martin, 93-285, p. 7 (La.10/17/94); (citations omitted): Under the Louisiana corpus delicti rule, an accused cannot be convicted on his own uncorroborated confession without proof that a crime has been committed by someone.
  • State v. East 745 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94); , citing 1 McCormick, Evidence § 145 (Strong ed., 4th ed.1992).
  • State v. Zeno 742 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    See State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State v. Simmons 738 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    See State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State v. Wessinger 736 So. 2d 162 La. 1999
    State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Koon, 96-1208 (La.5/20/97), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), ; State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94); ; cert.
  • State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
    Robertson , 97-0177 at p. 29, 712 So.2d at 32 ; State v. Koon, 96-1208 (La.5/20/97), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), ; State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Rochon 733 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    In State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State v. Davis 726 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State v. Chester 724 So. 2d 1276 La. 1999
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Frost 727 So. 2d 417 La. 1998
    716 , 133 L.Ed.2d 670 (1996); State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State v. Thibodeaux 728 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    State v. Koon, 96-1208 (La.5/20/97); ; State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94); , cert.
  • State v. Scott 720 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State v. McArthur 719 So. 2d 1037 La. 1998
    (evidence of heroin addiction inadmissible to show the motive for armed robbery); see also State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), (evidence that defendant told *1042 four people that he had killed the decedent because she accused him of raping her after they had sexual intercourse was admissible to show his motive to commit murder).
  • State v. Tyler 723 So. 2d 939 La. 1998
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94); .
  • State v. Washington 716 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Washington 716 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .
  • State v. Letulier 750 So. 2d 784 La. 1998
    State v. Koon, 96-1208, (La.5/20/97); ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158, (La.4/10/95); ; State v. Martin, 93-0285, (La.10/17/94); .
  • State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
    716 , 133 L.Ed.2d 670 (1996); State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), , cert.
  • State v. Gradley 745 So. 2d 1160 La. 1998
    [4] State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), .