Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Tart, 672 So. 2d 116.

150 citing documents.

  • State v. Dunn 41 So. 3d 454 La. 2010
    So.2d 162 (exjemployee33 returns to restaurant, shoots three and kills two); State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), (mixed-race couple stabbed to death in their home during an aggravated burglary); State v. Baldwin, 96-1660 (La.12/12/97), (defendant shot and killed his estranged wife and the three men who were with her at the time); State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), (defendant murdered his estranged girlfriend and severely wounded her mother); State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), (ex-emplo
  • State v. Barthelemy 32 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    at n. 18 (citing State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 19-20 (La.2/9/96), ).
  • State v. Reeves 11 So. 3d 1031 La. 2009
    78 The issue of conflicting loyalties may arise in several different contexts, 179 but may include the circumstance “where an attor *1082 ney runs into a conflict because he or she is required to cross-examine a witness who is testifying against the defendant and who was or is a client of the attorney.” Cisco , 2001-2732 p. 17, 861 So.2d at 129 , citing State v. Tart, 1993-0772 p. 19 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Diggs 1 So. 3d 673 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    The issue of conflicting loyalties usually arises in the context of joint representation, but it can also arise “where an attorney runs into a conflict because he or she is required to cross-examine a witness who is testifying against the defendant and who was or is a client of the attorney.” State v. Cisco, supra, citing State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , U.S. cert denied; State v. Kirkpatrick, supra.
  • State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
    190 , 142 L.Ed.2d 155 (1998); State v. Tart, 92-0772 (La.2/9/96), cert.
  • State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
    See State v. Draughn, 05-1825 (La.1/17/07), ; Bridgewater, supra ; Jacobs, supra; State v. Bowie, 00-3344 (La.4/3/02), ; Howard, supra ; Gradley; supra; State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), ; State v. Taylor, 99-1311 (La.1/17/01), ; Baldwin, supra .
  • State in the Interest of D. A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State ex rel. D. A. 995 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Additionally, in State v. Tart, 93-772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State Ex Rel. Da 995 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Additionally, in State v. Tart, 93-772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State in the Interest of D.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State ex rel. D.J. 995 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Tart, 93-773 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State Ex Rel. Dj 995 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Tart, 93-773 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Montejo 974 So. 2d 1238 La. 2008
    190 , 142 L.Ed.2d 155 (1998); State v. Tart, 92-0772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Hawkins 968 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    State v. Tart, 93-772 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
    See State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.2/23/99), (defendant and several others savagely beat and stabbed 82-year-old female victim in her home); State v. Robertson, supra, (defendant savagely stabbed an elderly couple to death during robbery in their home; victims were 76 and 71); State v. Tart, 92-0772 (La.2/9/96), (defendant bound and repeatedly stabbed elderly couple to death during robbery in their home; victims were 70 and 66); State v. Burrell, supra (defendant shot couple, age 65 and 56, in the
  • State v. Draughn 950 So. 2d 583 La. 2007
    State v. Tart, XXXX-XXXX p. 18 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Delaune 951 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    [4] State v. Tart, 94-0025 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Cogswell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Cogswell 918 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Tart, 94-0025, p. 19 (La.2/9/96), ; ...
  • State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
    1745 , 161 L.Ed.2d 612 (2005); State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 27 (La.10/16/01), -553 ; State v. Tart, 93-0772 p. 18 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Lagarde 917 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [5] State v. Tart, 93-772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Gatti 914 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Bell 896 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 19 (La.2/9/96)
  • State v. James 897 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    XXXX-XXXX (La.6/18/03), 847So.2d 1217 [2] See also State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , where the Court found the State sustained its burden of showing a knowing waiver.
  • State v. Gray 891 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
    See State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), ; cert.
  • State v. Jones 891 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. *780 51-52 (La.11/1/96), ; see also State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    Cf. State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), (acknowledging that "[a]lthough the mere presence of African-American jurors does not necessarily defeat a Batson claim, the unanimity requirement of a capital case sentencing recommendation may be considered.").
  • State v. Gray 874 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In State v. Tart, 93-0772, pp. 23-25 (La.2/9/96), , the Supreme Court upheld a trial court’s decision that the statements made by the defendant to a minister were not protected by the clergyman-penitent privilege found in former La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Poullard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    1246, 1265, 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991).” State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), cert.
  • State v. Poullard 863 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Cisco 861 So. 2d 118 La. 2003
    State v. Tart, 94-0025, p. 19 (La.2/9/96), *130
  • State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
    See State v. Howard, 98-0064, (defendant and several others savagely beat and stabbed 82-year-old female victim in her home); State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), (defendant savagely stabbed an elderly couple to death during robbery in their home; victims were 76 and 71); State v. Tart, 92-0772 (La.2/9/96), (defendant bound and repeatedly stabbed elderly couple to death during robbery in their home; victims were 70 and 66); Wingo, (defendant and co-defendant escaped from jail, burglarized th
  • State v. Robertson 843 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 23 (La.2/9/96), ; State v. Samuels, 94-1408, p. 7 (La.App.
  • State v. Raiford 846 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    See, State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Griffin 839 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/09/96), , cert.
  • State v. Narcisse 833 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    In State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Sylvester 834 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 23 (La.2/9/96), ; State v. Samuels, 94-1408, p. 7 (La.App.
  • State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
    Cf. State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 15 (La.2/9/96), *880 (A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror's responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice, or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.).
  • State v. Pugh 831 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    See, State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Clark 828 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Just as the Louisiana Supreme Court rejected the same argument in State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 51-52 (La.11/1/96), , 239 and State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), , this Court now rejects defendant's argument on this assignment of error.
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
    See State v. Broaden, 99-2124, (La.2/21/01), ; State v. Wessinger, 98-1234 (La.5/28/99), ; State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Tyler, 97-0338 (La.9/9/98) ; State v. Baldwin, 96-1660 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Ortiz, 96-1609 (La.10/21/97), ; State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), ; State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), .
  • State v. Bowie 813 So. 2d 377 La. 2002
    .2d 8 (elderly couple killed by an intruder who twice entered their home to remove items for pawning; at the second entry they awoke and were stabbed to death); State v. Hamilton, 92-1919 (La.9/5/96), (priest in home/rectory was bound, tortured pitilessly, stabbed, bludgeoned and strangled; the offenders fled in a vehicle belonging to the victim); State v. Tart, 92-0772(La.2/9/96), (70-year-old husband and his 66-year-old wife died as result of multiple stabbing and cutting wounds in their home;
  • State v. Sharp 810 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Burbank 811 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 51-52 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
    ing them and shot each one in the back of the head); State v. Baldwin, 96-1660 (La.12/12/97), (defendant shot and killed his estranged wife and three men who were present at the time with a sawed-off shotgun); State v. Ortiz, 96-1609 (La.10/21/97), (murder-forhire scheme resulting in death of defendant's wife and a visiting friend); State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), (defendant murdered his wife and severely wounded her mother); State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), (ex-employee returns to res
  • State v. Hayes 806 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 23 (La.2/9/96), , cert.
  • State v. Franklin 803 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.02/09/96), , U.S. cert.
  • State v. Duncan 802 So. 2d 533 La. 2001
    State v. Taylor, 99-1311 at p. 6 (La.1/17/01), -13 (noting that one African-American was on the actual jury and that the state had not exhausted all of its peremptory challenges); State v. Tart , 93-0772 p. 18 (La.2/9/96), (acknowledging that mere presence of African-American jurors does not defeat a Batson *553 claim, yet capital case unanimity requirement may be considered).
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 51-52 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), .
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Strickland, 94-0025, pp. 51-52 (La.11/1/96), ; State v. Tart, 93-0772, p. 55 (La.2/9/96), .