DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cross, 658 So. 2d 683.

145 citing documents.

  • State v. Jacobs 789 So. 2d 1280 La. 2001
    776 So.2d at 405 -06 (citing State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Lucky, 96-1687 (La.4/13/99), ).
  • State v. Frank 803 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
    State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 4 (La.1/14/94), ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 7 (La.6/30/95), .
  • State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
    State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 8 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 4 (La.1/14/94), .
  • State v. Flowers 782 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    |4The Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the law on point in State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), , 686-687: *689 La.
  • State v. Richardson 779 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    App.2d Cir.6/26/96), , writ denied, 96-1991 (La.2/21/97), , citing State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), .
  • State v. Miller 776 So. 2d 396 La. 2000
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), .
  • State v. Harris 765 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Ellis, 28,282 (La.App.2d Cir.6/26/96), , writ denied, 96-1991 (La.2/21/97), , citing State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), .
  • State v. Schmidt 771 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), ; appeal after remand, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98); , cert.
  • State v. Johnson 759 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Ellis, 28,282 (La.App.2d Cir.6/26/96), , writ denied, 96-1991 (La.2/21/97), .
  • State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
    State v. Cross, 93-1189, at p. 6 (La.6/30/95)
  • State v. Anthony 776 So. 2d 376 La. 2000
    State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95)
  • State v. Coleman 756 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    2nd Cir.6/24/98), , writ denied, 98-2217 (La.1/8/99), , citing State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), .
  • State v. Hundley 760 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; Bourque, 622 So.2d at 225 .
  • State v. Chambers 758 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); .
  • State v. LaCaze 759 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); .
  • State v. Blank 745 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[prejudice is presumed when a challenge for cause is erroneously denied by a trial court and the defendant has exhausted his peremptory challenges.” Therefore, when a defendant uses all of his peremptory challenges, a trial court’s erroneous ruling depriving him of one of
  • State v. Lucky 755 So. 2d 845 La. 1999
    State v. Cross, 93-1189, pp. 6-7 (La.6/30/95), -687 ; Robertson, 630 So.2d at 1281 .
  • State v. Wessinger 736 So. 2d 162 La. 1999
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; Bourque, 622 So.2d at 225 .
  • State v. Paul 738 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Bailey, supra .
  • State v. Wright 741 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95); ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
  • State v. Martin 736 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Cross, 93-1189, (La.6/30/95); ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95); ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
  • State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95)
  • State v. Meads 734 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In State v. Cross, 93-1189, pp. 6-7 (La.6/30/95); , the court held: "To prove there has been reversible error warranting reversal of the conviction and sentence, defendant need only show (1) the erroneous denial of a challenge for cause; and (2) the use of all his peremptory challenges."
  • State v. Richardson 729 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    614 , 136 L.Ed.2d 538 (1996); State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Chester 724 So. 2d 1276 La. 1999
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), .
  • State v. Lewis 724 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    In State v. Gross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that a trial court’s erroneous ruling on a challenge for cause, ^depriving the defendant of his peremptory challenges “constitutes a substantial violation of [the defendant’s] constitutional and statutory rights, requiring reversal of the conviction and sentence.” To successfu
  • State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
    State v. Cross, 93-1189, pp. 6-7 (La.6/30/95); -687 ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/24/94); .
  • State v. Butler 714 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Ellis, supra .
  • State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), .
  • State v. Johnson 706 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), .
  • State v. Lutcher 700 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Connolly 700 So. 2d 810 La. 1997
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 pp.6-7 (La.6/30/95), -87 ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), .
  • State v. Koon 704 So. 2d 756 La. 1997
    614 , 136 L.Ed.2d 538 (1996) (citing State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ).
  • State v. Turner 692 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95); ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
  • State v. Fox 690 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), .
  • State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    In State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); , the court discussed the defendant's burden of proof regarding claims of reversible error for denials of challenges: Prejudice is presumed when a challenge for cause is erroneously denied by the trial court and the defendant has exhausted all of his peremptory challenges.
  • State v. Warren 712 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), , and citations therein; State v. George, 26,867 (La.App.2d Cir. 4/5/95), , writ denied, 95-1151 (La.9/29/95), .
  • State v. Robinson 684 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95)
  • State v. Jeanlouis 683 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), .
  • State v. Cyriak 684 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); .
  • State v. Roy 681 So. 2d 1230 La. 1996
  • State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
    6/30/95), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.
  • State v. Ellis 677 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    6/30/95), , and citations therein; State v. George, 26,867 (La.App.
  • State v. Mathis 675 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Mitchell 674 So. 2d 250 La. 1996
    6/30/95), , we held that to prove error warranting reversal of his conviction and sentence, the defendant must show (1) the erroneous denial of a challenge for cause and (2) the use of all his peremptory challenges.