Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Maxie, 653 So. 2d 526.

123 citing documents.

  • State v. Letulier 750 So. 2d 784 La. 1998
    State v. Koon, 96-1208, (La.5/20/97); ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158, (La.4/10/95); ; State v. Martin, 93-0285, (La.10/17/94); .
  • State v. Brown 715 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
    State v. Koon, 96-1208, p. 18 (La.5/20/97), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158, p. 11, n. 8 (La.4/10/95), n. 8 .
  • State v. Joubert 705 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), was recently addressed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), .
  • State v. Cormier 702 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) was recently addressed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95); .
  • State v. Jack 700 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    The Louisiana Supreme Court tells us in State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95); , that: "In order to confirm a conviction, an appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient for a rational fact finder to conclude that every element of the crime was proved beyond a reasonable doubt."
  • State v. Connolly 700 So. 2d 810 La. 1997
    State v. Divers, 94-0756 p.6 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 p.15 (La.4/10/95), .
  • State v. Koon 704 So. 2d 756 La. 1997
    State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), n. 8 (citing State v. Martin, supra ); (La.
  • State v. Pooler 696 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Whins 692 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), .
  • State v. Hart 691 So. 2d 651 La. 1997
    State v. Divers, 94-0756 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), -81 ; -64 (La.1986).
  • State v. Turner 692 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95); ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95); ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94)
  • State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95); .
  • State v. Henderson 684 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), ; State v. Johnson, 27,522 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/6/95) ; (La.App.
  • State v. Seals 684 So. 2d 368 La. 1996
    State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), .
  • State v. Cousan 684 So. 2d 382 La. 1996
    State v. Maxie, 93-2158, p. 15 (La.4/10/95), .
  • State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
    4/10/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.
  • State v. Hamilton 681 So. 2d 1217 La. 1996
  • State v. Divers 681 So. 2d 320 La. 1996
    -81 (La.1994); State v. Ross, *324 -64 (La.1986).
  • State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
    State v. Maxie, 93-2158, p. 11 (La.4/10/95), , 532 fn.
  • State v. Sepulvado 672 So. 2d 158 La. 1996
    4/10/95), , this court reversed the defendant's conviction and sentence based upon an erroneous denial of a challenge for cause.
  • State v. Williamson 671 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    4/10/95), ; State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.
  • State v. Cross 658 So. 2d 683 La. 1995
    4/10/95); ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, (La.