Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Baxley, 633 So. 2d 142.

18 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Tazin Ardell Hill (Parish of Lafayette) The district court's declaration that the statutes are … La. 2020
State v. Draughter 130 So. 3d 855 La. 2013
Specifically, “a person can challenge the constitutionality of a statute only if the statute seriously affects his or her rights.” Id.; see also State v. Baxley, 93-2159 (La.2/28/94); .
State v. Jones 74 So. 3d 197 La. 2011
Finally, this case can be distinguished from State v. Baxley, 93-2159 (La.2/28/94), , where this Court held that a verbal request for oral sex did not constitute an attempt to commit a crime against nature in violation of La.
State of Louisiana v. Todd Andrew Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Jones 32 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The question was preparatory and not an overt act similar to that in [State v.] Baxley, [93-2159 (La.2/28/94), ].
State v. DEW 968 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
See also State v. Baxley, 93-2159 (La.02/28/94), .
State v. Houston 925 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
The Smith court distinguished these circumstances from those in State v. Baxley, 93-2159 (La.2/28/94), , in which the court held that soliciting oral sex by asking an undercover police officer to perform oral sex for $20 is only preparatory and is not an overt act which would support a conviction for the attempt of the crime solicited.
State v. Thomas 891 So. 2d 1233 La. 2005
More than a decade ago, in State v. Baxley, 93-2159 (La.2/28/94), , this court held that LSA-R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Orlon Peloquin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
2/28/94), wherein the defendant’s only act was to offer an 3 undercover police officer twenty dollars for oral sex.
State v. Peloquin 888 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
In Smith , the court cited State v. Baxley, 93-2159 (La.2/28/94), , wherein the defendant's only act was to offer an undercover police officer twenty dollars for oral sex.
State v. Kelly 814 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1 Furthermore, in State v. Baxley, 93-2159 (La.2/28/94), , where the *611 defendant maintained that a conviction for attempted crime against nature was a responsive verdict if the court found that he only discussed uncompensated fellatio with the undercover officer, the Supreme Court observed that the trial court seemed to accept this position, but the Court stated: This re
State v. Smith 766 So. 2d 501 La. 2000
Later, we stated: On the facts presented, it is unnecessary to determine whether LSA-R.S.
State v. Bullock 767 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
2/28/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that if either La.
State v. Smith 729 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
In State v. Baxley, 93-2159 (La.2/28/94), (La.
State v. Richmond 708 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Baxley, 93-2159 (La.2/28/94), .
State v. Smith 661 So. 2d 442 La. 1995
14:89(A)(1) in State v. Baxley, 93-2159 (La.2/28/94); .
State v. Baxley 656 So. 2d 973 La. 1995
2/28/94); (hereinafter Baxley I ).
State v. Smith 645 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
A recent Louisiana Supreme Court case, analyzed the issue in light of La.R.S.