Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Taylor, 669 So. 2d 364.
-
State v. Williams
22 So. 3d 867
La. 2009
Brumfield, 96-2667 (La.10/20/98), (defendant and co-defendant Henri Broadway shot and killed police officer escorting grocery store manager who was making a night deposit); State v. Wessinger, 98-1234 (La.5/28/99), (defendant shot and killed two people, and injured two people during the course of an armed robbery at a restaurant); State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), (during armed robbery in a restaurant where defendant had previously been an | .^employee, he shot and killed one employee and s
-
State v. Stukes
19 So. 3d 1233
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), ; State v. Hailey, 2002-1738 (La.App.
-
State v. Culp
17 So. 3d 429
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
In State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court agreed with the defendant that Watts was violated when the trial court denied the defendant the right to use backstrikes, i.e., exercise his remaining peremptory challenges immediately before the jury panel was sworn, but found the error harmless.
- State v. GRH 10 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- State of Louisiana v. G. R. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
-
State v. Jacobs
13 So. 3d 677
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , 376-377 cert.
-
State v. Johnson
2 So. 3d 606
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Taylor, 1993-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Holmes
5 So. 3d 42
La. 2008
2597 , 115 L.Ed.2d 720 (1991); State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), -70 , cert.
-
State v. Camper
996 So. 2d 571
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 7 (La.2/28/96), .
-
State v. Robbins
986 So. 2d 828
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Casey, supra; State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Campbell
983 So. 2d 810
La. 2008
art. 841; [150] State v. Taylor, 93-2201 p. 7 (La.2/28/96), ; cert.
- State of Louisiana v. Timothy G. Falcucci La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
State v. Falcucci
982 So. 2d 270
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
art. 790, and State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), .
-
State v. Jackson
979 So. 2d 678
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Davenport
978 So. 2d 1189
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
overruled on other grounds by State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , writ denied, 519 U.S. 860 , 117 S.Ct.
-
State of Louisiana v. Walter R. Cox, Sr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
art. 841; State v. Taylor, 93-2201, pp. 4-7 (La.2/28/96), -69.
-
State v. Cox
974 So. 2d 891
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
art. 841; State v. Taylor, 93-2201, pp. 4-7 (La.2/28/96), -69 .
-
State v. Gage
965 So. 2d 592
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
102 , 163 L.Ed.2d 116 (2005), citing State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Frank
957 So. 2d 724
La. 2007
State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 22 n. 10 (La.2/28/96), .
-
State v. Riley
941 So. 2d 618
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
[2] Smith was overruled on other grounds, that being the ability of the Court to consider assignments of error in death cases in the absence of a contemporaneous objection, in State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), .
-
State v. Snyder
942 So. 2d 484
La. 2006
See also State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), ("peremptory challenges are exercisable at any time before the jury panel is sworn,") citing LSA-C.Cr.P.
-
State v. Cambre
939 So. 2d 446
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
art. 841; State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), -369 , cert.
-
State v. Smith
935 So. 2d 797
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Casey, supra ; State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.02/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Scott
921 So. 2d 904
La. 2006
art. 841; State v. Taylor, 93-2301 (La.2/28/96), (scope of review in capital cases is limited to alleged errors that are contemporaneously objected to).
-
State v. Juniors
915 So. 2d 291
La. 2005
State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 21 n. 10 (La.2/28/96), , 376 n. 10.
-
State v. Allen
913 So. 2d 788
La. 2005
In State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 6-7 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Lai
902 So. 2d 550
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Snyder, 98-1078 (La.4/14/99), ; State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Lacoste
896 So. 2d 1180
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 19 (La.2/28/96), .
-
State v. Harris
892 So. 2d 1238
La. 2005
art. 841(A) ("An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence."); State v. Taylor, 93-2201 p. 7 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Cowden
889 So. 2d 1075
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Manning
885 So. 2d 1044
La. 2004
See State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Shrader
881 So. 2d 147
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Jackson
880 So. 2d 69
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Smith
877 So. 2d 1123
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[13] State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Hall
875 So. 2d 996
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Uloho
875 So. 2d 918
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Snyder, supra , quoting, State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Landry
876 So. 2d 146
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
The contemporaneous objection rule prevents “a defendant from gambling for a [ ¿favorable verdict and then, upon conviction, resorting to appeal on errors which either could have been avoided or corrected at the time or should have put an immediate halt to the proceedings.” State v. Taylor, 93-2201 p. 7 (La.2/28/96), -69 ().
-
State v. Legrand
864 So. 2d 89
La. 2004
See, e.g., State *107 v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), (affirming death penalty for singleshot armed robbery-murder when jury also found other aggravating circumstance that defendant had caused risk of great bodily harm to another victim), cert.
-
State v. Williams
866 So. 2d 1003
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 19 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
-
State v. Fernandez
864 So. 2d 764
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Snyder, supra , quoting, State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 19 (La.2/28/96), , cert.
- State of Louisiana v. Cedric Lynn Sias La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Sias
861 So. 2d 829
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
art. 841; State v. Taylor, 93-2201, pp. 4-7 (La.2/28/96), -69 .
-
State v. Carmouche
872 So. 2d 1020
La. 2003
In State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , the defendant was an ex-employee of Cajun's Fabulous Fried Chicken restaurant in Baton Rouge.
-
State v. Hailey
863 So. 2d 564
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
In State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , the Louisiana Supreme Court agreed with the defendant that Watts was violated when the trial court denied the defendant the right to use backstrikes, i.e., exercise his remaining peremptory challenges immediately before the jury panel was sworn, but found the error harmless.
-
State v. Clark
851 So. 2d 1055
La. 2003
art. 841; State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 7 (La.2/28/96), ; Wessinger , 98-1234 at p. 20, 736 So.2d at 181 .
-
State v. Tate
851 So. 2d 921
La. 2003
10/19/99), ; State v. Brumfield, 96-2667 (La.10/20/98), ; State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), ; State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), ; State v. Scales, 93-2003 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Craig, 95-2499 (La.5/20/97), .
-
State v. Taylor
838 So. 2d 729
La. 2003
P. art. 841; State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 7 (La.2/28/96), (scope of review in capital cases is limited to alleged errors occurring during the guilt phase that are contemporaneously objected to).
-
State v. Melancon
826 So. 2d 633
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 21 (La.2/28/96)
-
State v. Harry
823 So. 2d 987
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 19 (La.2/28/96), .
-
State v. Dickerson
822 So. 2d 849
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[4] State v. Taylor, 93-2201 (La.2/28/96), , cert.