Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 672 So. 2d 158.

67 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Robert Javontie Marks La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Trevonte Lamarque Talbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Ronald St. Cyre La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Dotson 257 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Sepulvado , 93-2692, p. 7 (La.4/8/96), , 164.
State of Louisiana v. Matthew R. Dotson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Defendant cites the following supreme court case: “Photographs are generally admissible if they illustrate any fact, shed any light upon an issue in the case, or are relevant to describe the person, thing, or place depicted.” State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 7 (La.4/8/96)
State of Louisiana v. Darrin Kashy Duhon -Aka- Darrin Duhon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/6/05), this court stated as follows: The appointment of a sanity commission “is not a perfunctory matter or a ministerial duty of the trial court nor is it guaranteed to every accused in every case.” 3 (La.1975); State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96)
State v. Duhon 224 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Mickelson 210 So. 3d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Wilson 208 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Law 189 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jamal Anthony Charles AKA - Jamal A. Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Charles 178 So. 3d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker 181 So. 3d 590 La. 2015
4/8/96), “[c]learly if the defense intends to develop a certain view of the defendant‟s background, the state should be allowed to elicit information to contradict these assertions.” Thus, “neither law nor justice permits a defendant to foist a spurious reputation upon a jury because the State is so limited in its cr
State v. Mack 162 So. 3d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
a Supreme Court set forth the following applicable law in State v. Magee, 2011-0574, pp. 54-55 (La.9/28/12), , to determine the admissibility of photographs: “Photographs are generally admissible if they illustrate any fact, shed any light upon an issue in the case, or are relevant to describe the person, thing, or place depicted.” State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 7 (La.4/8/96), .
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Bardwell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Allen 141 So. 3d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 6 (La.4/8/96), , the Supreme Court addressed the issue of prejudicial photographs, and held: Photographs are generally admissible if they illustrate any fact, shed any light upon an issue in the case, or are relevant to describe the person, thing or place depicted.
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
“Photographs are generally admissible if they illustrate any fact, shed any light upon an issue in the case, or are relevant to describe the person, thing, or place depicted.” State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 7 (La.4/8/96), .
State v. Bruce 93 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
See State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.04/08/96), , cert.
State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
oks, repeatedly raped an 11-year-old boy and shot him several times); , rev’d, 94-2438 (La.10/16/95), ; (during the course of an aggravated burglary, defendant cut the throats of his 6-year-old and 11-year-old victims, allowing them to drown in their own blood); State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), (defendant, over a three-day period, tied a rope around his 6-year-old stepson’s neck, threatened to hang him, beat him, put his head in the toilet and flushed, refused to feed him, kicked him fro
State of Louisiana v. Richard W. Black La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/6/05), which explains: The appointment of a sanity commission “is not a perfunctory matter or a ministerial duty of the trial court nor is it guaranteed to every accused in every case.” State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96)
State v. Black 33 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 12/15/04), , writ denied, 05-231 (La.5/6/05), , which explains: The appointment of a sanity commission “is not a perfunctory matter or a *1031 ministerial duty of the trial court nor is it guaranteed to every accused in every case.” State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), .
State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
In State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), , this court held that cause challenges were properly denied under the "substantial impairment" standard for a juror who would "kind of lean" toward the death penalty, but would entertain a life sentence if the judge instructed him to do so, and for a juror who felt the death penalty was appropriate for the murder of
State v. Allen 913 So. 2d 788 La. 2005
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 18 (La.4/8/96), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. John Joseph Normand La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Normand 896 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), .
State v. Ripley 889 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/08/96), , cert.
State v. McLelland 860 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), , cert.
State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
In State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), , the defendant, over a three-day period, tied a rope around his six-year-old stepson's neck, threatened to hang him, refused to feed him, beat him, put his head in the toilet and flushed, kicked him from one room to another, and, finally, put him in a tub of scalding water which produced third-degree burns over sixty
State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
hree people, including a three-year-old); State v. Langley, 95-1489 (La.4/14/98), , conviction vacated on other grounds, 95-1489 (La.4/3/02), (finding prima facie case of discrimination in selection of jury foreperson); Connolly, 96-1680, (defendant killed nine-year-old boy during the course of an aggravated rape); State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), (defendant hit six-year-old stepson over the head with a screwdriver then submerged him in a bathtub of scalding water); Wille, (defendant kil
State v. Robertson 843 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), ; State v. Hohn.
State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
See State v. Baldwin, 96-1660 (La.12/12/97), (defendant shot and killed estranged wife and three others); State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), (defendant beat six-year-old stepson unconscious with a screwdriver and then immersed him in scalding water resulting in the child's death).
State v. Sylvester 834 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), ; State v. Hohn.
State v. Wright 834 So. 2d 974 La. 2002
In State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), , cert.
State v. Williams 831 So. 2d 835 La. 2002
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, pp. 4-5 (La.4/8/96), , cert.
State v. Jones 822 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), , cert.
State v. Bowie 813 So. 2d 377 La. 2002
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), -66 ("Neither law nor justice permits a defendant to foist a spurious reputation upon a jury because the state is so limited in its cross-examination of the character witnesses.") Similarly, the state has no right to distort the victim's character for its own purposes.
State v. Deal 802 So. 2d 1254 La. 2001
In State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), , cert.
State v. Gustavis 788 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), ; State v. Hohn, supra.
State v. Black 786 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), , cert.
State v. Broaden 780 So. 2d 349 La. 2001
In State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), , this court held that cause challenges were properly denied under the "substantial impairment" standard for a juror who would "kind of lean" toward the death penalty, but would entertain a life sentence if the judge instructed him to do so, and for a juror who felt the death penalty was appropriate for the murder of
State v. Asberry 808 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
See State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 12 (La.4/8/96), , cert.
State v. Miller 776 So. 2d 396 La. 2000
In State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96), , this court held that cause challenges were properly denied under the "substantial impairment" standard for a juror who would "kind of lean" toward the death penalty, but would entertain a life sentence if the judge instructed him to do so, and for a juror who felt the death penalty was appropriate for the murder of
State v. Coldman 769 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 4 (La.4/8/96), ; State v. Hohn, supra .
State v. Bullitts 746 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 8 (La.4/8/96); , cert.
State v. Bradford 745 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.04/08/96), , cert.
State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96); ; -68 (La.1984).
Distinguished State v. Watts 746 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
The present case is both factually and procedurally distinguishable from State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692, p. 13 (La.4/8/96), , cert.
State v. Henderson 740 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
4/8/96), , rehearing denied, 5/10/96, cert.
State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
See State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96); (The defendant has no right "`to foist a spurious reputation upon the jury' and `if the defense intends to develop a certain view of the defendant's background,' the State should be allowed to elicit information to contradict those assertions.") ().