Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Comeaux, 699 So. 2d 16.

105 citing documents.

State v. Stein 874 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
1993), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Kennerson, 96-1518, p. 25 (La.App.
State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
1983); State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Roy, 95-0638 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), ; and State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Hotard 864 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:451; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Redditt 868 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:451; State v. Comeaux, 9327296 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Franklin 858 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:451; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Bradley 858 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:451; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Sims 845 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:451; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Watson 844 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
15:451; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Wright 834 So. 2d 974 La. 2002
More recently, in State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Williams 831 So. 2d 835 La. 2002
See State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , and cases cited therein.
State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
See State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , and cases cited therein.
State v. Louviere 833 So. 2d 885 La. 2002
See, e.g. State v. Comeaux, 93-2729, p. 8 (La.7/1/97) ("the judge, and not the jury, determines the admissibility of the evidence....").
State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
[47] See State v. Comeaux, 93-2729, p. 21 (La.7/1/97), (defendant, 17-years-old at commission of the crimes and mildly retarded with an IQ of 68, "made no showing that the degree of his mental impairment, when combined with his youth, rendered him incapable of acting at the level of culpability required for the imposition of the death penalty."), cert.
State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
art. 712; State v. Strickland, 94-0025, p. 23 (La.11/1/96), ; overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
1514 , 140 L.Ed.2d 667 (1998), overruled on other grounds, State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97)
State v. Deal 802 So. 2d 1254 La. 2001
Id.; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), -22 , cert.
State v. Blank 804 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
15:451; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729, p. 47 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Duncan 802 So. 2d 533 La. 2001
[30] See, e.g., State v. Connolly, 96-1680 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), ; cert.
State v. Offray 797 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
overruled on other grounds, State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97)
State v. MM 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
1514 , 140 L.Ed.2d 667 (1998), overruled on other grounds, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97); .
State v. M.M. 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1514 , 140 L.Ed.2d 667 (1998), overruled on other grounds, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97); .
State v. Smith 793 So. 2d 1199 La. 2001
The State counters that Detective Ronquillo's testimony was properly admitted because his testimony was probative to establish the defendant's propensity to kill execution-style, citing State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
State v. Monroe 784 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 10/19/00), , citing LSA-R .S. 15:451; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729, p. 47 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Sholes 782 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
1514 , 140 L.Ed.2d 667 (1998), overruled on other grounds, cert.
State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
See, e.g., State v. Connolly, 96-1680 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Quest 772 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
15:451; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729, p. 47 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
343 , 139 L.Ed.2d 266 (1997); State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (7/1/97), .
State v. Hundley 760 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
A appeal after remand, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97); , cert.
State v. Lockett 754 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See State v. Johnson, 94-1379 (La.11/27/95), -102 ; , 241 n. 20 (La.1993), overruled in part on other grounds, State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Hobley 752 So. 2d 771 La. 1999
E.g., State v. Comeaux, 93-2729, p. 11 (La.7/1/97), .
State v. Lucky 755 So. 2d 845 La. 1999
343 , 139 L.Ed.2d 266 (1997); State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97); -22 , cert.
State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
More recently, in State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97); , this court noted: At the outset, it is important to note that the judge, and not the jury, determines the admissibility of the evidence of unrelated criminal conduct by determining whether the defendant's commission of the criminal conduct was proved by clear and convincing evidence and whether the unrelated con
State v. Wessinger 736 So. 2d 162 La. 1999
overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97)
State v. Watts 735 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
15:451; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729, p. 47 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
1993), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
See also State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Connolly, 96-1680 (La.7/1/97)
Overruled State v. Green 735 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
State v. Chester 724 So. 2d 1276 La. 1999
See State v. Craig, 95-2499 (La.5/20/97), , State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97)
State v. Rhodes 722 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
appeal after remand, 93-2729 *1080 (La.7/1/97), , cert.
State v. Spradley 722 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
1514 , 140 L.Ed.2d 667 (1998), overruled on other grounds sub nom., State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
State v. Causey 721 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Ann. art. 465 A(31); overruled on other grounds in State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
In State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), , this court declined to place significant restrictions on the amount of this type of evidence, as long as the evidence is highly relevant to the defendant's character and propensities.
State v. Cooks 720 So. 2d 637 La. 1998
State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), -22 , cert.
State v. Hankton 719 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
1796 , 108 L.Ed.2d 798 (1990); reversed on other unrelated grounds, State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), .
State v. Lecoq 717 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
15:451; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729, p. 47 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. McCorkle, 97-966 (La.App.
State v. Letulier 750 So. 2d 784 La. 1998
However, we retreated from Bourque in the decision of State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97); .
State v. Langley 711 So. 2d 651 La. 1998
1993), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97); .
State v. Hebert 716 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
NOTES [1] In State v. Comeaux, 93-2729, p. 9 (La.7/1/97): , 21 the Louisiana Supreme Court over-ruled a portion of Bourque not connected with the ruling relied upon herin stating: The Bourque decision limited the amount of admissible evidence that the prosecutor may introduce in the case-in-chief of the penalty phase, holding that anything beyond "minimal evidence" of the un