Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cittadino, 628 So. 2d 251.

21 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Steven Rodney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
  • State v. Reaux 165 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Phillips 130 So. 3d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    1 Cir. 6/29/98) , , writ denied, 98-3041 (La.4/1/99), , (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 105 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State ex rel. A.D. 95 So. 3d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    shington, supra, “[a] toy gun has been held to be a dangerous weapon for purposes of an armed robbery conviction if the jury finds that ‘the 17interaction between the offender and the victim created a highly charged atmosphere whereby there was a danger of serious bodily harm resulting from the victim’s fear for his life.’ ” Id., (La.App.
  • State v. Bowers 909 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Fleming 902 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Kemp 896 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Billard 852 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Mills 790 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5th Cir.4/12/00), , writ denied, 00-1371 (La.2/16/01), , (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    A toy gun has been held to be a dangerous weapon for purposes of an armed robbery conviction if the jury finds that “the interaction between the offender and the victim created a highly charged atmosphere whereby there was a danger of serious bodily harm resulting from the victim’s fear for his life.” (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Calvin 781 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Perkins 762 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Wickem 759 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Harrell 727 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Woods 713 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Lee 709 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Winfrey 703 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State in Interest of CD 658 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Cotton 646 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994