Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Allen, 638 So. 2d 394.

28 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Ralph Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Johnson 265 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Carter 96 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
P. art. 921; , writ granted, 94-1754 (La.11/29/94), and writ recalled, 94-1754 (La.3/16/95), .
State v. Chinn 91 So. 3d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Suggs 70 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Todd Vincent Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 5/31/94), writ granted, 94-1754 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Alfonzo Jermaine Johnlouis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 5/31/94), writ granted, 94-1754 (La.
State v. Johnlouis 22 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 5/31/94) , , writ granted, 94-1754 (La.11/29/94), , writ recalled, 94-1754 (La.3/16/95), 651 So.2d *1165 1343, the court found a sentence of twenty years was not excessive for a second | ^.felony offender convicted for possession of at least 28 but not more than 200 grams of cocaine.
State v. Jerome 845 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Harris 817 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Jones 800 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Jones 800 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Hollins 742 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 5/13/94), , 401 writ granted, writ recalled, State v. Pendelton, 96-367 (La.App.
State v. Robinson 744 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Richmond 734 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 5/13/94), , 401 writ granted, writ recalled, where defendant failed to file a motion to reconsider sentence, this court held that “out of an abundance of caution” it would consider the merits of defendant’s exces-siveness argument.
State v. Richmond 734 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 5/13/94), , 401 writ granted, writ recalled, where defendant failed to file a motion to reconsider sentence, this court held that "out of an abundance of caution" it would consider the merits of defendant's excessiveness argument.
State v. Jones 729 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 5/31/94), ; (La.App.
State v. Rainey 722 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/31/94) , ; State v. Henderson, 94-286 (La.
State v. Medious 722 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/31/94) , ; State v. Curtis, 97-769 (La.App.
State v. Branch 714 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
5th Cir. 5/31/94), , writ recalled 94-1754 (La.3/16/95), .
State v. Richards 713 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/31/94) , , writ granted, 94-1754 (La.11/29/94), , writ recalled, 94-1754 (La.3/16/95), .
State v. Richmond 708 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/13/94) , , writ granted, writ recalled, (1995) where the defendant failed to file a motion to reconsider sentence, this court held that "out of an abundance of caution" it would consider the merits of the defendant's excessiveness argument.
State v. McCorkle 708 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/31/94) , ; State v. Henderson, 94-286 (La.App.
State v. Curtis 707 So. 2d 1328 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir. 5/31/94) , , this Court has noted that the Mims decision did not address the issue of whether a defendant's failure to file a motion to reconsider his sentence precluded even a claim of "constitutional" excessiveness.
State v. Bradford 676 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
5th Cir. 5/31/94), , writ recalled, 94-1754 (La.
State v. Alberto 665 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
5 Cir. 5/31/94) , , writ granted, 94-1754 (La.
State v. Mouton 653 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Henderson 648 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
5th Cir. 5/31/94), , this court nonetheless considered the argument, even though defendant failed to file a motion or orally object to the sentence.