Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Neisler, 633 So. 2d 1224.
-
La. 2020
2/28/94), (court of appeal “reached the right result, but for the wrong reasons”); (La.
-
State v. Butler
117 So. 3d 87
La. 2013
art. 2133(B) [,(“A party who does not seek modification, revision, or reversal of a judgment in an appellate court, including the supreme court, may assert in support of the judgment, any argument supported by the record although he has not appealed, answered the appeal, or applied for supervisory writs.”); State v. Neisler, 93-1942 (La.2/28/94), (court of appeal “reached the right result, but for the wrong reasons”); (same).
-
State v. Lee
77 So. 3d 946
La. 2011
See State v. Neisler, 93-1942, p. 8-9 (La.2/28/94); -30 .
-
State v. Rochon
75 So. 3d 876
La. 2011
93-1942, p. 3 (La.2/28/94); .
-
State v. Wallace
25 So. 3d 720
La. 2009
State v. Neisler, 93-1942 (La.2/28/94), .
- Wilson v. CITY OF PONCHATOULA 18 So. 3d 1272 La. 2009
-
State v. Brazley
773 So. 2d 718
La. 2000
LAW AND ANALYSIS The issue of whether Articles 340(E) and 342 are unconstitutional local *721 laws was raised by Amicus in State v. Neisler, 93-1942 (La.2/28/94), , 1232 n. 19; however, we declined to reach the issue because it was raised for the first time by a non-party.
- State v. Taylor 769 So. 2d 535 La. 2000
-
State v. Brewster
764 So. 2d 945
La. 2000
See also State v. Neisler, 93-1942, n. 9 (La.2/28/94), (constitutionality of a statute delegating judicial functions to appointed magistrate commissioners was not raised by any of the parties to the proceeding and could not be considered).
-
State ex rel. Jackson
757 So. 2d 900
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
The court in State v. Neisler, 93-1942 (La.2/28/94), dealt with a similar issue.
-
State v. Brewster
764 So. 2d 969
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
The State also contends that in State v. Neisler, 93-1942 (La.2/28/94), , 1229 n. 9, the supreme court declined to address the constitutionality of Revised Statute 13:1347, which delegated judicial functions to the appointed magistrate commissioners because the issue was not raised by the parties.
- 730 Bienville Partners, Inc. v. Seiler 703 So. 2d 1386 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
-
State v. Sprint Communications Co., LP
699 So. 2d 1058
La. 1997
where we noted for guidance purposes, "[t]he criminal court should implement some sort of random allocation system designed to prevent `judgeshopping' and the appearance of favoritism."
- State v. Jackson 670 So. 2d 1215 La. 1996
- State v. Green 637 So. 2d 153 La. 1994