Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 37 La. Ann. 200.
-
State v. Cotton
110 So. 480
La. 1926
877 ; ; State v. Burns, 38 La.
- State v. Bezett 104 So. 55 La. 1925
-
State v. Johnson
60 So. 702
La. 1912
Nevertheless, , decided in 1885, where the siureties had produced the accused at the same term of court at which the bond had been forfeited and judgment of forfeiture entered, and had then immediately, before any trial had been had, moved to set aside the forfeiture on the ground that the accused had been produced at the same term
-
State v. Goss
55 So. 723
La. 1911
Ann. 542 ; ; State v. Wilson, 13 La.
-
State v. Dykes
52 So. 245
La. 1910
The court in a case on appeal said that the question was not an open one; proceeding to forfeit is criminal in character, , and State v. Cassidy, 7 La.
- State ex rel. Hinds v. Leonard 50 So. 854 La. 1909
-
State v. Shoots
50 So. 842
La. 1909
§ 214; ; State v. Toups, 44 La.
-
State v. Martin
24 So. 590
La. 1898
In State vs. Williams, , the sureties of defendant on his appearance bond appealed from a decree refusing to set aside a judgment of forfeiture, and the appeal was maintained.