DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Phipps v. Amtrak, 666 So. 2d 341.

14 citing documents.

  • Jackson v. BASF Corp. 927 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    1 Cir. 11/20/95), , writ denied, 95-3012 (La.02/28/96), .
  • Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 844 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    1st Cir.11/20/95), , writ denied, 95-3012 (La.2/28/96), , in which the plaintiff had traversed a recessed train aisle several times within the hour preceding her fall, stepping up and down each time, and so was clearly aware that the aisle was designed with a recessed area between the seating areas.
  • Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 772 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    1st Cir. 11/20/95), ; writ denied, 95-3012 (La.2/28/96), .
  • Alexander v. City of Baton Rouge 739 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    1st Cir.11/20/95), , writ denied, 95-3012 (La.2/28/96), ; Thornton, 702 So.2d at 74 ; Wilson v. City of New Orleans, 95-2129 (La.App.
  • Hamilton v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 710 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    1 Cir. 11/20/95) , , writ denied, 95-3012 (La.2/28/96), , the court dismissed a train passenger’s action against a railway company, after finding that the “defect” alleged by the plaintiff did not impose an unreasonable risk of harm.
  • Ford v. Beam Radiator, Inc. 708 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    1st Cir. 11/20/95); -44 , writ denied, 95-3012 (La.2/28/96); .
  • Zanders v. Golden Age Home Care Center 705 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1st Cir. 11/20/95), , writ denied, 95-3012 (La.2/28/96), .
  • Grissette v. Thomas 704 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1st Cir. 11/20/95), , writ denied, 95-3012 (La.2/28/96), , this court followed Green v. City of Thibodaux , finding that the determination of whether the design of an observation car of a train created an unreasonable risk of harm was a legal determination which was not protected on review by the manifest error rule.
  • Blanchard v. STATE, THROUGH PARKS & REC. COM'N 702 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    1 Cir. 11/20/95) ; , writ denied, 95-3012 (La.2/28/96); .
  • Blanchard v. State ex rel. Parks & Recreation Commission 702 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1 Cir. 11/20/95) ; , writ denied, 95-3012 (La.2/28/96); .
  • Brown v. Hudson 700 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1st Cir. 11/20/95), , writ denied, 95-3012 (La.2/28/96), .
  • Lee v. Magnolia Garden Apartments 694 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1st Cir. 11/20/95); -344 , writ denied, 95-3012 (La.2/28/96); .
  • Delaune v. Medical Ctr. of Baton Rouge 683 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    I Cir. 11/20/95); -345 , we specifically reviewed the trial court's factual findings, regarding physical configuration, pursuant to the manifest error standard.
  • Hataway v. Jeep Corp. 679 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    App. 1 Cir. 11/20/95), , writ denied, 95-3012 (La.