Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fusilier v. Slick Const. Co., 640 So. 2d 788.

36 citing documents.

Kevin Jones v. Craft Resource Solution & Accident Fund Ins. Company of America La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Chanse Ceasar v. Flexforce Employment Professionals,inc.& Zurich American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3 Cir. 6/1/94), the claimant had only been employed for three weeks before his injury, but he had over twenty hours of overtime in the second and third weeks of his employment.
Carlos A. Juarez Versus Aj Lazo Construction, LLC, and Louisiana Construction and Industry Self Insurer's Fund (Lci) La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 3 Cir. 6/1/94), and Upchurch v. Randall Well Service, 45,056 (La.
James Crawford Bailey v. Veolia Environmental Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 6/1/94), ); see also Alleman v. Fruit of the Loom- Crowley, 96-1246, p. 8 (La.App.
Bailey v. Veolia Envtl. Servs. 237 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 6/1/94) , ); see also Alleman v. Fruit of the Loom-Crowley , 96-1246, p. 8 (La.App.
John Wiltz v. Todd's Car Wash La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 6/1/94), the court held that a worker, who had been released to light duty work and refused his employer’s offer of light duty work at the same wage and hours, was not entitled to SEB.
Wiltz v. Todd's Car Wash 126 So. 3d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 6/1/94) , , the court held that a worker, who had been released to light duty work and refused his employer’s offer of light duty work at the same wage and hours, was not entitled to SEB.
Wolf v. City of Baton Rouge 111 So. 3d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Upchurch v. Randall Well Service 34 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Yvonne Grillette v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Grillette v. Alliance Compressors 923 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/1/94), , *779 791.
Tina Palmer v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/1/94), we held that “[w]here the claimant has been released to light duty work and refuses his employer’s offer of light duty work at the same wage and hours, he is not entitled to SEB.” The instant case can be decided on this rationale, which is 4 consistent with our pri
Palmer v. Alliance Compressors 917 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/1/94), , we held that "[w]here the claimant has been released to light duty work and refuses his employer's offer of light duty work at the same wage and hours, he is not entitled to SEB."
Harrison v. Auto King 879 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Derrick v. YAMAHA POWER SPORTS 850 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 6/1/94) , (cites omitted).
Gaspard v. Dollar General Corp. 842 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Palmer v. Schooner Petroleum Services 834 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 6/1/94) ; (where employee failed to attempt to do light-duty work offered by his employer); and Blanchard v. Federal Exp.
Smith v. JE Merit Constructors, Inc. 835 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Cooley v. K-Mart Corp. 799 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
JE Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Hickman 758 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 6/1/94); , to support her conclusion that Plaintiff be considered a part-time employee.
Bolton v. Grant Parish School Bd. 730 So. 2d 882 La. 1999
3d Cir.6/1/94), , declined to award these benefits because claimant refused the receptionist position.
Bolton v. Grant Parish School Board 709 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 6/1/94); , which points out that an employee is not entitled to supplemental earnings benefits when an employee has been released by his treating physician to engage in light-duty work and has refused his employer’s offer of a light-duty position.
Smith v. Martin Mills, Inc. 701 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
TEXACO INC. v. Foreman 692 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Landry v. City of New Iberia 689 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
App.3 Cir. 6/1/94); , the defendant suggests that the law is clear that where a workers’ compensation claimant has been released to light-duty work and refuses his employer’s offer of such work at the same wages and hours, he is not entitled to continue to receive SEB.
Griffith v. Ohmstede, Inc. 685 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
3 Cir. 6/1/94) , , where this court found that the nature of worker’s compensation law requires “liberal construction” of.
Washington v. Lyons Specialty Co. 683 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Rose v. Martco, Inc. 689 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Fritz v. Home Furniture-Lafayette 677 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Henry v. Bolivar Energy Corp. 676 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
3 Cir. 6/1/94) ; , the claimant had only been employed for three weeks before his injury, but he had accrued over twenty hours of overtime in the second and third weeks of his employment.
Lolan v. Louisiana Industries 664 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Ferrier v. Jordache-Ditto's 662 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Hurst v. Baker Sand Control 671 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
3rd Cir. 6/1/94), ; Rachal v. Crown Store Equipment Co., 93-1602, p. 3 (La.App.
Comeaux v. Sam Broussard Trucking 657 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Fusilier v. Slick Const. Co., 94-11 (La.App 3 Cir. 6/1/94), .
Lastrapes v. Martin Mills/Farley Industries 657 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Vincent v. Justiss Oil Co., Inc. 649 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994