DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stegall v. J & J EXTERMINATING, 651 So. 2d 400.

22 citing documents.

  • Daphne Reissland v. Valluzzo Companies, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • Gaynell Finister v. Golden Nugget Lake Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    3 Cir. 3/1/95), 403, we held an employer “may not proceed with an attitude of 29 indifference to the injured worker's situation.” An unjustified belief that 30 an injury did not result from an accident does not excuse a failure to 31 pay workers' compensation benefits.
  • Charles Evans v. Winn Lumber Company, LLC and Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
  • Groover v. Lafitte's Boudoir, Inc. 162 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 3/1/95), , and Dupont, 96-684, p. 7, 685 So.2d at 528 .
  • Richard v. HSLI & Touro Infirmary 119 So. 3d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • Gwendolyn Rochester v. Southwest Developmental Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 3/1/95), and Dupont v. Holiday Inn of Jennings, 96-684 (La.App.
  • Rochester v. SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER 36 So. 3d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 3/1/95) , and Dupont v. Holiday Inn of Jennings, 96-684 (La.App.
  • Ivory v. Southwest Developmental Center 980 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/1/95) , and Dupont v. Holiday Inn of Jennings, 96-684 (La.App.
  • Wanetta Ivory v. Southwest Developmental Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/1/95), and Dupont v. Holiday Inn of Jennings, 96-684 (La.App.
  • Gaspard v. Dollar General Corp. 842 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 3/1/95); , we held that an employer “may not proceed with an attitude of indifference to the injured worker’s situation.” An unjustified belief that an injury did not result from an accident does not excuse a failure to pay workers’ compensa *464 tion benefits.
  • Colonial Nursing Home v. Bradford 834 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 3/1/95) , , we held an employer "may not proceed with an attitude of indifference to the injured worker's situation."
  • Jones v. Universal Fabricators 758 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 3/1/95) ; , we found that "penalties and attorney's fees have been imposed where the insurer *862 gathers incomplete data in preparing the claim[.]" The WCJ, in the instant case, stated that: "[d]espite the fact defendant was well aware claimant had a condition that at one time warranted immediate surgical intervention, th
  • Peloquin v. Eunice News 737 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 3/1/95) , , we found that "[a]n insurer may not proceed with an attitude of indifference to the injured worker's situation."
  • Spinks v. James Hutchins Farms 736 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    3 Cir. 3/1/95) , , we found that "penalties and attorney's fees have been imposed where the insurer gathers incomplete data in preparing the claim or makes no attempt to correct an error that was pointed out to it.
  • Fisher v. Lincoln Timber Co. 730 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc. 721 So. 2d 885 La. 1998
  • Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc. 707 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    3 Cir. 3/1/95); , wherein a panel of this court stated the following as to an employer’s miscalculation of benefits: Generally, an insurer will not be penalized for a simple miscalculation of benefits; however, penalties and attorney’s fees have been imposed where the insurer gathers incomplete data in preparing the claim or mak
  • Kirn v. East Jefferson Hosp. 691 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Dupree v. Ace Home & Auto 685 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    3 Cir. 3/1/95); , we stated: Generally, an insurer will not be penalized for a simple miscalculation of benefits; however, penalties and attorney’s fees have been imposed where the insurer gathers incomplete data in preparing the claim *690 or makes no attempt to correct an error that was pointed out to it.
  • Clifton v. RAPIDES REGIONAL MED. CENTER 689 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir. 3/1/95) ; ; (La.App.
  • Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc. 676 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    3 Cir. 3/1/95) , and Ceasar v. Crispy Cajun Restaurant, 94-30 (La.App.
  • Lucas v. T.L. James & Co. 664 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    3 Cir. 3/1/95); , citing Mallet v. Louisiana Nursing Homes, Inc., (La.App.