Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Crooks v. Town of Ball, 649 So. 2d 597.

21 citing documents.

Musson Patout Automotive Group v. Jimmy Maynard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Linda Louvier v. U-Haul Company of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Bridgette Johnson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Johnson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 88 So. 3d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Smith v. Quarles Drilling Co. 885 So. 2d 562 La. 2004
3 Cir. 11/2/94) , , for the proposition that interest automatically attaches whether prayed for in the petition or mentioned in the judgment.
Lester Smith v. Quarles Drilling Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Smith v. Quarles Drilling Co. 865 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Phillips v. Joseph Management Services, Inc. 861 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
George v. Guillory 776 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Matthews v. VIP International, Inc. 762 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Town of Basile v. Clark 769 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
3 Cir. 11/2/94) ; , this court held that SSP is inclusive in the calculation of the average weekly wage.
Clark v. Town of Basile 719 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir.11/2/94); , which mandates that state supplemental pay under La.R.S.
Gregory v. Interim Personnel of North Louisiana 717 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Trentecosta v. Beck 714 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
McLaughlin v. Hill City Oil Co./Jubilee Exxon 702 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 11/2/94) ; , this appellate court concluded that interest mandated under La.R.S.
Kortz v. Colt Energy Services, Inc. 698 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Manuel v. River Parish Disposal, Inc. 683 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
3 Cir. 11/2/94) , , the Third Circuit Court of Appeal stated: La.R.S.
Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc. 676 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Rideaux v. Franklin Nursing Home 688 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Hammons v. ABB CE SERVICES, INC. 671 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
3d Cir. 11/2/94), ; Brazley v. Burger King/CIGNA, (La.App.
Preis v. Preis 649 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Our reasons for decision appear in this case, and a separate judgment is being handed down today in the other, (La.App.