Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hall v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 658 So. 2d 204.

22 citing documents.

Michael Burley v. New York Life Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 5/31/95), (emphasis in original removed, our emphasis added).
Oubre v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan 79 So. 3d 987 La. 2011
3 Cir. 5/31/95), (holding "[i]f there are no damages proven as a result of the breach itself, then the maximum amount that can be awarded is $5000.00 in penalties”)(citing Robichaux v. Jackson National Life Ins.
Durio v. Horace Mann Insurance Co. 74 So. 3d 1159 La. 2011
3 Cir. 5/31/95) , ; Gilpin v. State Farm Mut.
Audubon Orthopedic & Sports Medicine, APMC v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 38 So. 3d 963 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Buffman Inc. v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 36 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Melba Lee See v. Entergy Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
See v. Entergy Corp. 24 So. 3d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Ibrahim v. Hawkins 845 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
3rd Cir.5/31/95), ; McClendon v. Economy Fire & Cas.
Hollier v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 799 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Rogers v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 796 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Bousay v. Allstate Insurance Co. 741 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
App. 3 Cir. 5/31/95), ; See also Hayes v. Richard, 92-601 (La.App.
Gilpin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 735 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Calogero v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 735 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 5/31/95) ; ; Midland Risk Ins.
McClendon v. Economy Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 732 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Haas v. Audubon Indem. Co. 722 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 5/31/95) ; ; Midland Risk Ins.
Pineville Police Officers' Ass'n, Local 1990 v. City of Pineville 713 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Brinston v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 703 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
PAUL T. THIBODEAUX v. Stapp Towing Co. 702 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 5/31/95) ; , far from suggesting that we may deviate from the clear and unambiguous wording of La.R.S.
Ramirez v. Ware 680 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
3d Cir. 5/31/95), ; (La.App.
Spear v. Tran 682 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
3 Cir. 5/31/95) , and Khaled v. Windham, 94-2171, p. 11, 12 (La.App.
Graves v. Businelle Towing Corp. 673 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
[7] In Hall v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, 94-867 (La.App.3rd Cir. 5/31/95); , the court noted that the insurer correctly argued that the penalty provision of LSA-R.S.
Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co. 664 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996