Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Quaid, 646 So. 2d 343.

256 citing documents.

In re Melton 848 So. 2d 519 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1816 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Callahan 846 So. 2d 728 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Pinkston 852 So. 2d 966 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Harris 847 So. 2d 1185 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Hardy 848 So. 2d 511 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Crawford 843 So. 2d 1091 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In Re Jackson 842 So. 2d 359 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94)
In re Jackson 843 So. 2d 1079 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Williams 842 So. 2d 353 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Brigandi 843 So. 2d 1083 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re LaGrone 843 So. 2d 1057 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ;.
In Re Blair 840 So. 2d 1191 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), .
In Re Grevemberg 838 So. 2d 1283 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), .
In Re Bilbe 841 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
In re Lawrence 841 So. 2d 699 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Graham 841 So. 2d 707 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Hilburn 840 So. 2d 471 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Reynolds 840 So. 2d 477 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Crittenden 839 So. 2d 936 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1816 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall, (j While we are not bound in any way by the findings and recommendations of the hearing committee and disciplinary board, we have held the manifest error standard is applicable to the committee’s factual findings.
In re Cohen 840 So. 2d 484 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re White 840 So. 2d 488 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Elbert 840 So. 2d 494 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Condoll 840 So. 2d 502 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisi *507 ana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Bonnette 840 So. 2d 512 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Laurent 835 So. 2d 430 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Alex 835 So. 2d 455 La. 2003
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Morphis 831 So. 2d 934 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In Re Hackman 833 So. 2d 916 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316, p. 8 (La.11/30/94)
In re Casanova 847 So. 2d 1169 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Dunn 831 So. 2d 889 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Ali 829 So. 2d 1015 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Mathews 827 So. 2d 1129 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Schambach 826 So. 2d 539 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Turnage 826 So. 2d 546 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Richard 826 So. 2d 542 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Smith 821 So. 2d 1286 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Dumas 819 So. 2d 313 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In Re Marinoff 819 So. 2d 305 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana *311
In re Henderson 819 So. 2d 296 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In re Dumaine 818 So. 2d 756 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In Re Faucheux 818 So. 2d 734 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94)
In re Robinson 819 So. 2d 280 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall
In Re Barstow 817 So. 2d 1123 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94)
In re DuBarry 814 So. 2d 1273 La. 2002
The board cited the following cases: In re: Butler, 96-1235 (La.9/13/96), (six month suspension imposed on attorney for filing meritless claims); In re: Wells, 98-DB-071 (4/13/99) (public reprimand imposed on attorney for filing a meritless suit); In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), (six month suspension imposed on attorney for filing suit against a client in bad faith and failing to deliver property to the client); and In re: King, 94-0686 (La.11/30/94), (disbarment imposed for attorney’s will
In Re Broome 815 So. 2d 1 La. 2002
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), .
In re Keele 783 So. 2d 1261 La. 2001
Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11(G); In re: Caulfield, 96-1401 (La.11/25/96), ; In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), .
In re Ferrouillet 764 So. 2d 948 La. 2000
11/30/94), (citing Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Boutall, (La.
In re Levingston 755 So. 2d 874 La. 2000
11/30/94), (attorney disbarred for collecting an illegal fee in a Social Security matter; the attorney's prior disciplinary record was found to be a significant aggravating factor).
In Re Dyer 750 So. 2d 942 La. 1999
In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.11/30/94), ( and Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 18(C)).
In re Quaid 740 So. 2d 104 La. 1999
In In re: Quaid, 94-1316 (La.2/16/95); , respondent was disbarred for assessing an excessive fee in a Social Security case and seeking to cover up his misconduct.