Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Meany v. Meany, 639 So. 2d 229.

103 citing documents.

James V. Chapman and Wanda D. Chapman v. Diggs Transportation, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Maria Mickens Green, Individually and as the Natural Tutrix of the Minors, Joshua Evans, Makiya Mickens, Vernon Evans, … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
7/5/94), Finch v. HRI Lodging, Inc., supra.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua C. Riley La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Faith in Farming Company, L.L.C. v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development Consolidated with … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Rose George and Melvin George v. Abc Insurance Company and Southern University of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Synikia Hester Individually And On Behalf Of Kunta La. 2021
James v. Ernest N. Morial New Orleans Exhibition Hall Auth. 262 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Harrel v. Harrel 251 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
7/5/94), ; Fuqua v. Fuqua , 46,118 (La.
Shephard v. AIX Energy, Inc. 249 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
7/5/94), ; Ryan v. Case New Holland Inc. , 51,062 (La.
Christopher Blanchard v. Demetrius J. Hicks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
In Meany v. Meany, 94-251 (La.7/5/94), the supreme court explained the principles involved in determining legal duty for Louisiana tort negligence determinations.
Blanchard v. Hicks 244 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In Meany v. Meany , 94-251 (La.7/5/94), , the supreme court explained the principles involved in determining legal duty for Louisiana tort negligence determinations.
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Hotel Management of New Orleans, L.L.C. 219 So. 3d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Mackey v. Thompson 204 So. 3d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Jones v. Stewart 203 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Toups v. Dantin 181 So. 3d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94), .
Lawrence v. Sanders 169 So. 3d 790 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
See also Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, supra; Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94), ; Norton v. Claiborne Elec.
Parvin Wesley Brown, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
7/5/94), citing Brown v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.App.
Brown v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 166 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“It is a recognized principle of the law of evidence that if expert testimony given in response to hypothetical questions is predicated on a statement of unproven facts, it has no probative value and should not affect the outcome of the case.” Meany v. *1202 Meany, 94-251 (La.7/5/94), , citing Brown v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.App.
Ed Grabowski, Et Ux. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Grabowski v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. 149 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Meany v. Meany, 94-251 (La.7/5/94), .
Salafian v. Gabriel 146 So. 3d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94), .
Frost v. Carter 140 So. 3d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Meany v. Meany, 940251, (La.7/5/94), .
Bonds v. SAPA Extrusions, LLC 135 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
In Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.07/05/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that certain policy considerations are to be taken into account in analyzing whether a duty is owed, stating: In determining whether to impose a duty in a particular situation, the court may consider various moral, social, and economic factors, including whether the imposi
Alexander v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. 123 So. 3d 712 La. 2013
As this court stated in Meany v. Meany, 94-0251, p. 6 (La.7/5/94), , certain policy considerations are to be taken into account in analyzing whether a duty is owed: In determining whether to impose a duty in a particular situation, the court may consider various moral, social, and economic factors, including whether the imposition of a duty would result in an unmanageable flow o
Jaligam v. Pochampally 115 So. 3d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251, p. 11 (La.7/5/94), .
Teter v. Apollo Marine Specialities, Inc. 115 So. 3d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 12/17/08), (citing Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94), ) (noting that “[t]he question of whether a duty is owed, as well as the scope of that duty, is a question of law.
Alexander v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. 110 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94)
Crockham v. Thompson 107 So. 3d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Brown v. Eppinette, 36,405 (La.App.2d Cir.12/18/02), ; Barry v. Plaquemine Towing Corporation, 96-0979 (La.App.1st Cir.8/4/97), , writ denied, 97-2579 (La.1/9/98), ; Robin v. Mississippi Fast Freight Company, Inc., 97-2556 (La.App.1st Cir.12/28/98), , writ denied, 99-0688, (La.4/30/99), ; Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94), .
Ponceti v. First Lake Properties, Inc. 93 So. 3d 1251 La. 2012
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251, p. 6 (La.7/5/94), .
Fuqua v. Fuqua 57 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94), ; Verret v. Verret, supra.
Carrier v. City of Amite 50 So. 3d 1247 La. 2010
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251, p. 6 (La.7/5/94), .
Rosalind Reed Thibodeaux v. Lauren Wade O'Quain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Thibodeaux v. O'QUAIN 33 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 10/31/01), (citing Meany v. Meany, 94-251 (La.7/5/94), ).
Carleen Willis v. Rapides Parish Communications District A/K/A 911" " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251, p. 6 (La.7/5/94)
Willis v. RAPIDES PARISH COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT 30 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251, p. 6 (La.7/5/94), .
Jeffery Alexander Arkell v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
11/30/99), ], 99-1222 at 4, 752 So.2d at 766; Meany v. Meany, 94-0251, p. 6 (La.7/5/94)
Arkell v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government 28 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
11/30/99)], 752 So.2d [762] at 766; Meany v. Meany, 94-0251, p. 6 (La.7/5/94), .
Martinez v. Wilson 24 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94), .
Orrill v. Orrill 5 So. 3d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
If the opinion is based on facts not supported by the record, the opinion may be rejected.” Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94), .
Joyce Marie Perry v. Capital One, N.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251, p. 6 (La.7/5/94)
Perry v. Capital One, N. A. 1 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251, p. 6 (La.7/5/94), .
Gammill v. Invacare Corp. 2 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94); .
Knicely v. Xyz Ins. Co. 997 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Discussing Louisiana's duty-risk analysis in Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94), , our supreme court stated: A threshold issue then in any negligence action is whether the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty.
Holland v. Teague 996 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94), .
ND v. Ochsner Clinic, LLC 983 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Peggy Bergeron v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Palermo v. Port of New Orleans 951 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Estate of Loveless Ex Rel Loveless v. Gay 945 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Meany v. Meany, XXXX-XXXX (La.7/5/94), .
Edwards v. LCR-M CORP., INC. 936 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Lemann, supra ; Meany v. Meany, 94-0251 (La.7/5/94), .