DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Leyva v. Iberia General Hosp., 643 So. 2d 1236.

17 citing documents.

  • Joanne Grafton and Billy Grafton, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Shelly Grafton v. Elizabeth Hammond … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2026
  • Kieffer v. Plunkett-Kuspa 138 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See Leyva v. Iberia General Hospital, 94-0 795 (La.10/17/94), -1239 ; Ardoin v. Hartford Ace.
  • Berthelot v. Stalder 132 So. 3d 1249 La. 2014
    See Leyva v. Iberia General Hospital, 94-0795 (La.10/17/94)
  • Jeannie Heitman v. Christus Health Central D/B/A Christus St. Francis Cabrini Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    10/17/94), Piazza v. Behrman Chiropractic Clinic, Inc., and Donaldson v. Sanders, 94-1366 (La.App.
  • Heitman v. Christus Health Central 49 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Hosp., 94-795 (La.10/17/94), ; Piazza v. Behrman Chiropractic Clinic, Inc., and Donaldson v. Sanders, 94-1366 (La.App.
  • Willis v. Smith 999 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    [2] The supreme court has reversed judgments for the improper exclusion of a medical expert, as in Roberts v. Warren, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), , and Leyva v. Iberia General Hosp., 94-0795 (La.10/17/94), .
  • Belt v. Wheeler 833 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Leyva v. Iberia General Hospital, 94-0795 (La.10/17/94), ; Piazza v. Behrman Chiropractic Clinic, Inc., (La.
  • McDaniel v. Reed 798 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In Leyva v. Iberia General Hospital, 94-0795 (La.10/17/94), , the Louisiana Supreme Court considered whether a board certified obstetrical surgeon was qualified to testify as an expert as to the standard of care applicable to a general practitioner from a different locale who performed a tubal ligation.
  • Roberts v. Warren 791 So. 2d 1278 La. 2001
    Hosp., 94-795 (La.10/17/94), , we held that, "[w]here there is a uniform nationwide method for performing a particular medical procedure, an expert having knowledge of such method is qualified to testify, and that the testifying expert in this circumstance is not constrained by the need to have practiced in a similar community or locale and under
  • Roberts v. Warren 782 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    1992) for the principle that "where there is a uniform nationwide method as to a particular procedure or uniform principles involved, an expert having knowledge as to the same is qualified to testify and ...
  • Campbell v. HOSPITAL SERV. DIST. NO. 1, CALDWELL PARISH 768 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Hosp., 94-0795 (La.10/17/94), ; Richardson v. State, 98-918 (La.App.
  • Corley v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HOSP. 749 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    See e.g., Leyva v. Iberia General Hospital, 94-0795 (La.10/17/94), ; Richardson v. State, 98-918 (La.App.
  • Dixon v. Mayeux 705 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Gordon v. Willis Knighton Medical Center 661 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Rowsey v. Jones 655 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Ricker v. Hebert 655 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    10/17/94), (obstetrician/gynecologist testified as to standard required of general practitioner in performing tubal litigation); (La.App.
  • Todd v. Sauls 647 So. 2d 1366 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994