DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 646 So. 2d 318.

219 citing documents.

  • Rhodes v. State Through DOTD 684 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    See Campbell v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development, 94-1052 p. 5 (La.1/17/95), ; Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corporation, 94-0952 pp. 4-5 (La.11/30/94), ; Roberts *1141 v. Benoit, on rehearing, reh.
  • Ardoin v. City of Mamou 685 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-952, (La.11/30/94); .
  • Gray v. Economy Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 682 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 (La.11/30/94); .
  • Teel v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 681 So. 2d 340 La. 1996
    Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 p. 4 (La.11/30/94), ; Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
  • Moore v. Fleming Subway Restaurants, Inc. 680 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    11/30/94), ; Rowe v. Schumpert Medical Center, 26,334 (La.
  • Vig v. City of Shreveport 679 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    11/30/94), ; Rowe v. Schumpert Medical Center, 26,334 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/7/94), .
  • Ducote v. City of Alexandria 677 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    11/30/94), , stated: This discretionary function exception to governmental liability applies only when a policy judgment is made at the ministerial level, not at the operational level.
  • Misenheimer v. WBR PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE 677 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    11/30/94), , the Supreme Court discussed the duty/risk analysis as follows: Under a duty/risk analysis, all four inquiries must be affirmatively answered for plaintiff to recover.
  • Osborne v. Vulcan Foundry, Inc. 675 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • White v. City of Baker 676 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Sanders v. Spector 673 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Harris v. Godwin 671 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Lewis v. Kahn 670 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    11/30/94), , Kahn’s actions were an unreasonable use of excessive force.
  • Robinson v. Yousuf 668 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Whatley v. Caddo Parish Sheriff's Dept. 661 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 655 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    11/30/94), ; Thomas C. Galligan, Jr., A Primer on the Patterns of Negligence, 53 La.L.Rev.
  • Elder v. Rowe 653 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    4th Cir. 1/13/94), , rev’d on other grounds, 94-0952 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Moore v. Esponge 651 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    11/30/94), , the supreme court reiterated the following four-prong inquiry of the duty/risk analysis: (1) Was the conduct in question a substantial factor in bringing about the harm to the plaintiff, i.e., was it a cause-in-fact of the harm which occurred?
  • Wolfe v. Wiener Enterprises, Inc. 648 So. 2d 1293 La. 1995