Beoh v. Watkins
Beoh v. Watkins, 640 So. 2d 1325 (La. 1994).
Cited by
- Davis v. Witt 851 So. 2d 1119 La. 2003
- Davis v. Witt 831 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
- Konneker v. Sewerage & Water Bd. 703 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- Eppinette v. City of Monroe 698 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- Mayo v. Audubon Indem. Ins. Co. 666 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- Beoh v. Watkins 646 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Keith v. Property 649 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Opinion text
640 So.2d 1325 (1994) Robert BEOH et al. v. Charles E. WATKINS, Allstate Insurance Company et al. Charles WATKINS v. SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS, et al. Richard SHORTY, et al. v. Charles WATKINS, Allstate Insurance Company, et al. No. 94-C-1086. Supreme Court of Louisiana. June 24, 1994. PER CURIAM. Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside for reasons assigned by Judge Landrieu in his dissenting opinion. In a bifurcated trial, the litigant tried by the judge is entitled to have the judge make an independent determination of liability and damages without influence by the jury's determination. Case remanded to the court of appeal to conduct a de novo review of the record without giving deference to the decision of the trial judge. WATSON, HALL and ORTIQUE, JJ., would deny the application. DENNIS, J., not on panel.