DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Allen v. Allen, 648 So. 2d 359.

43 citing documents.

  • Derek H. Tucker v. Renate Tucker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    the supreme court again addressed cruel treatment.
  • Valerie Gober v. Greg Gober, Sr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
  • Barnett v. Barnett 193 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94); .
  • Matthews v. Matthews 184 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), .
  • King v. King 136 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    See Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), ; Hunter v. Hunter, supra.
  • Shirley v. Shirley 127 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Id.; Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), .
  • Gisleson v. Deputy 122 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    art. Ill, 1997 Revision Comment (c)(citing Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), ).
  • Katherine Trahan Ashworth v. Larry Leroy Ashworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • Ashworth v. Ashworth 86 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), .
  • McMullen v. McMullen 82 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Jeffery Daniel Smith v. Ginger Lemaire Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    The behaviors should be of the nature that “compel a separation because the marriage is unsupportable.” Allen v. Allen, 94-1090, p. 13 (La.12/12/94), ().
  • Schmitt v. Schmitt 28 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    art. 111, 1997 Revision Comment (c)(citing Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), ).
  • Hunter v. Hunter 21 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    See Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), ; see also LSA-C.C.
  • Palmisano v. Palmisano 10 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Blane Guillory v. Rachel Cefalu Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Guillory v. Guillory 7 So. 3d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The behaviors should be of the nature that “compel a separation because the marriage is unsupportable.” Allen v. Allen, 94-1090, p. 13 (La.12/12/94), ().
  • Cormier v. Cormier 3 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Adkins v. Adkins 954 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    See Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), .
  • Explained John David Moore v. Estelle Martin Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    12/12/94), (emphasis added), “Art[icle] 969(A) is a procedural safeguard ensuring each party the opportunity to 2 BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY (6th ed. 1990) defines “dotal” as: “Relating to the dos or portion of a woman; constituting her portion; comprised of her portion.” “Dotal property” is further defined as: “
  • Explained Moore v. Moore 920 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    2 Cir.1993), reversed on other grounds, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), (emphasis added), “Art[icle] 969(A) is a procedural safeguard ensuring each party the opportunity to | ¡^present evidence and have a full hearing on all issues involving spousal property rights.” Thus, the court in Allen held that deciding the validity of a premarital contract was not appropriate on summary judgment b
  • Gremillion v. Gremillion 900 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    App. 2 Cir. 12/5/01), ; Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), .
  • Jenkins v. Jenkins 882 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    2 Cir. 12/5/01), ; Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), .
  • Jones v. Jones 877 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    art. 111; Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), ; Roan, supra ; Jones v. Jones, 35,502 (La.App.2d Cir.12/05/01), .
  • Roan v. Roan 870 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    2 Cir. 12/5/01), ; Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), .
  • Anderson v. Anderson 839 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), .
  • Jones v. Jones 804 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), .
  • Hammack v. Hammack 778 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    1 Cir. 9/25/98), [3] Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94)
  • Lyons v. Lyons 768 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), .
  • Mayes v. Mayes 743 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), .
  • Goodnight v. Goodnight 735 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090, pp. 8-9 (La.12/12/94); .
  • Minella v. Minella 713 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), -363 .
  • Bourg v. Bourg 701 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    art. 138 fault grounds for purposes of alimony preclusion after 1990, [2] the Louisiana Supreme Court resolved the issue in Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94); .
  • Bruce v. Bruce 696 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090, p. 8 (La.12/12/94), .
  • Simon v. Simon 696 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94); .
  • Roussel v. Roussel 688 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    * * * Legal fault consists of serious misconduct, which is a cause of the marriage’s dissolution.” Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94); .
  • Wagner v. Wagner 686 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (La.12/12/94), , citing Gormley v. Gormley, 161 La.
  • Caldwell v. Caldwell 672 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • Doane v. Benenate 671 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Manzanares v. Manzanares 656 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Dore v. Dore 657 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Allen v. Allen 653 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Unkel v. Unkel 651 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    Allen v. Allen, 94-1090 (12/12/94)
  • Manzanares v. Manzanares 650 So. 2d 246 La. 1995