DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 646 So. 2d 330.

38 citing documents.

  • Floyd Safford v. New Orleans Fire Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
    11/30/94), and then citing Collins v. Gen.
  • Harris David v. Vermilion Shell & Limestone Co.,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    the claimant’s burden of proof and application of the legal presumption as follows: 4 “An employee in a worker’s compensation action has the burden of establishing a causal link between the work-related accident and the subsequent disabling condition.” Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94)
  • David v. Vermilion Shell & Limestone Co. 153 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    This court has explained the claimant’s burden of proof and application of the legal presumption as follows: |fi“An employee in a worker’s compensation action has the burden of establishing a causal link between the work-related accident and the subsequent disabling condition.” Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Guevara v. Brand Energy & Infrastructure Services, Inc. 129 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Keys v. Republic Services 99 So. 3d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In support of his conclusion, the WCJ cited Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94), .
  • James Keys v. Republic Servs, Inc./allied Waste Servs of Acadiana-Scott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • Donald Ray Brown v. Town of Ferriday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Brown v. Town of Ferriday 76 So. 3d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    A panel of this court recently reiterated the presumption of causation applicable in workers’ compensation cases, stating: “An employee in a workers’] compensation action has the burden of establishing a causal link between the work-related accident and the subsequent disabling condition.” Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Kermit Richard v. Vermilion Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    This court has explained a claimant’s burden of proof and the application of this legal presumption as follows: “An employee in a worker[s’] compensation action has the burden of establishing a causal link between the work-related accident and the subsequent disabling condition.” Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94)
  • Richard v. Vermilion Hospital 41 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    This court has explained a claimant’s burden of proof and the application of this legal presumption as follows: “An employee in a workers’] compensation action has the burden of establishing a causal link between the work-related accident and the subsequent disabling condition.” Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Amos v. Ouachita Parish Police Jury 991 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Coats v. AT & T Company, 95-2670 (La.10/25/96), ; Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94), ; Collins v. General Motors Corp., 31,782 (La.App.
  • Michael C. Parrish v. Van Tel Communications La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    “An employee in a worker’s compensation action has the burden of establishing a causal link between the work-related accident and the subsequent disabling condition.” Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94)
  • Parrish v. Van-Tel Communications 967 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Edwards v. PROCTER & GAMBLE MFG. 952 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    23:1221(2); see also, Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Lester Edwards v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Randall Marks v. 84 Lumber Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    “An employee in a worker’s compensation action has the burden of -3- establishing a causal link between the work-related accident and the subsequent disabling condition.” Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94)
  • Marks v. 84 Lumber Co. 939 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Duplessis v. Orleans Parish School Board 850 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.App.11/30/94), .
  • Turner v. Conagra Poultry Co. 842 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Drouillard v. City of Vinton Police Department 815 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Sandidge v. Sandidge 804 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Baullion v. Old American Pottery Co. 801 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “An employee in a worker’s compensation action has the burden of establishing a causal link between the work-related accident and the subsequent disabling condition.” Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94); .
  • Greenhill Nursing Home v. Ferguson 796 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    [[Image here]] “An employee in a worker’s compensation action has the burden of establishing a causal link between the work-related accident and the subsequent disabling condition.” Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94); .
  • Harris v. National Gypsum Co. 797 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4th Cir.1968), Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94), , and Haughton v. Fireman’s Fund American Ins.
  • Marks v. 84 Lumber Co. 771 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 6 (La.11/30/94); .
  • Collins v. General Motors Corp. 736 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Id.; Miller v. *950 Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94), .
  • Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp. 704 So. 2d 1161 La. 1997
    (citing Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94), ).
  • City of Jennings v. Dequeant 704 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94); .
  • Ball v. Wilco Marsh Buggies, Inc. 695 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94), ; Peveto v. WHC Contractors, 93-1402 (La.1/14/94), ; Kampen v. Conway Southwest Exp., 95-45 (La.App.
  • Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp. 691 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    23:1221(3)(a); Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94), ; (La.App.
  • Rapp v. City of New Orleans 681 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    [2] The plaintiffs cited Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151, p. 9-10 (La.11/30/94) , but it does not support their claims.
  • Washington v. Lyons Specialty Co. 683 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Coats v. American Tel. & Tel. Co. 681 So. 2d 1243 La. 1996
  • Clifton v. RAPIDES REGIONAL MED. CENTER 689 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Lytle v. City of New Orleans 681 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc., 94-1151 (La.11/30/94), ; Schmitt v. City of New Orleans, unpub., 95-1903, (4th Cir. 7/31/96).
  • Miller v. Roger Miller Sand, Inc. 676 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Fontenot v. Trans Gulf, Inc. 664 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Smith v. Morehouse General Hosp. 658 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995