Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Independent Fire Ins. v. Able Moving & Storage Co., 650 So. 2d 750.

16 citing documents.

Gregory Jones, Jr. v. the Boot Bar & Grill, C. Napco, Inc., Craig Napoli, Nancy Napoli, Aline Napoli, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Co. v. Able Moving & Storage Co., Inc., 1994-1982, p. 4, ).
Service First, Inc. v. Timothy D. Plumley consolidated with Service First, Inc. v. Timothy D. Plumley La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Espinosa v. Accor North America, Inc. 174 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co. v. Able Moving & Storage Co., Inc., 94-1982, p. 6 (La.2/20/95), .
Ed Grabowski, Et Ux. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
2/20/95), the supreme court determined that a national moving company, Bekins, clothed Able Moving and Storage Co., Inc., a 22 moving company operating in Baton Rouge, with actual and apparent authority to conduct business on its behalf.
Grabowski v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. 149 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Able Moving and Storage Co., Inc., 94-1982 (La.2/20/95), , the supreme court determined that a national moving company, Bekins, clothed Able Moving and Storage Co., Inc., a | ^moving company operating in Baton Rouge, with actual and apparent authority to conduct business on its behalf.
Martin v. A-1 Home Appliance Center, Inc. 117 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Mr. Martin relies on the case of Independent Fire Insurance Company v. Able Moving and Storage Company, Inc., 94-1982 (La.2/20/95), , for the | fiproposition that when a principal clothes another with the apparent authority to act for it, the principal is liable for the delictual acts of that other where the victim has relied to his detriment on that apparent authority.
Washington v. Premiere Automotive, L.L.C. 872 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co. v. Able Moving and Storage Company, Inc., (La./95), , and Barrilleaux v. Franklin Foundation Hospital, (La.App.
Trent Holloway v. Shetler Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Holloway v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 861 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
v. Able Moving, 94-1982 (La.2/20/95)
Parish National Bank v. Ott 817 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
The Appellant bases this argument on the Louisiana Supreme Court’s application of the Restatement (Second) Agency § 8B in Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Able Moving and Storage Co., Inc.
Waffle House, Inc. v. Corporate Properties, Ltd. 780 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In Independent Fire Insurance Co. v. Able Moving and Storage Co., Inc., 94-1982, p. 6, (La.2/20/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court further discussed the principle of apparent authority, as applicable prior to adoption of Acts 1997, No. 261, noting: Apparent authority is an estoppel principle which operates in favor of third persons seeking to bind a principal for unauthorized acts of an agent.
Clampit v. Interstate Dodge, Inc. 771 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Co. v. Able Moving and Storage Co., Inc., 94-1982 (La.2/20/95), .
Brockman v. Salt Lake Farm Partnership 768 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Co. v. Able Moving & Storage Co., 94-1982 (La.2/20/95), ; Restatement (2d) of Agency, § 8 (1958).
Brumfield v. Gafford 768 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
2d Cir.), writ denied, but see Independent Fire Insurance Company v. Able Moving and Storage Company, Inc., 94-1982 (La.2/20/95), .
Stephens v. Bail Enforcement of Louisiana 690 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
[7] In Independent Fire Insurance Company v. Able Moving and Storage Company, Inc., 94-1982, p. 6 (La.2/20/95); , the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that the general rule stated in Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc., did not apply when third persons act to their detriment on the basis of an agent's apparent authority.
Salley v. COLONIAL MARINE INDUS. 680 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996