Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 657 So. 2d 1292.

35 citing documents.

Nicholas Jude Gregory and Sara Hummel Gregory and Progressive Bank v. Landowners Title of Ouachita L.L.C. and Continental … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Merlin Lombard, II La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Steven Richard, Jr. v. Quality Construction & Production,llc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Cox v. W. M. Heroman, Inc., overruled on other grounds by A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 94–2011, p. 9 (La.6/30/95)
Corley Enters. of La., Inc. v. Bear Creek Saloon, Inc. 273 So. 3d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
La. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. Burkett 266 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Curole v. Delcambre 224 So. 3d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Heroman & Co., Inc., overruled on other grounds by A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 94-2011, p. 9 (La.6/30/95), .
Old Republic Life Insurance Co. v. TransWood Inc. 222 So. 3d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Bach v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners 193 So. 3d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Heroman & Co., Inc., overruled on other grounds by A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Sli-dell Memorial Hosp., 94-2011, p. 9 (La.6/30/95), .
Vagelos v. Abramson 126 So. 3d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Heroman and Co., overruled on other grounds by A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 94-2011, p. 9 (La.6/30/95), .
Paul Latiolais v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Latiolais v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. 74 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
brogation as “the substitution of one person to the rights of another.” The supreme court explained a subrogees’ rights in Barreca v. Cobb, 95-1651, p. 3 (La.2/28/96), , stating “the insurer stands in the shoes of the insured and acquires the right to assert the actions and rights of the plaintiff.” See also Copeland Enters., Inc. v. Slidell Mem’l Hosp., 94-2011 (La.6/30/95), .
Greemon v. City of Bossier City 65 So. 3d 1263 La. 2011
1974), overruled on other grounds by A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 94-2011, p. 9 (La.6/30/95), .
Stonebridge Development v. STONEBRIDGE ENT. 954 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
[2] Overruled on other grounds in A. Copeland Enterprises Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 94-2011 (La.6/30/95), .
Mike D. Leger v. Sonnier Exterminating La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1995), stated that “in order for an obligor to be bound, the obligation must be solidary and indivisible.
Leger v. Sonnier Exterminating Co. 926 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The Louisiana Supreme Court in A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hospital, 94-2011, p. 7 (La.1995), , stated that "in order for an obligor to be bound, the obligation must be solidary and indivisible.
Alvis v. CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING 918 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
A. Copeland Enters., Inc. v. Slidell Mem'l Hosp., 94-2011, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), .
Randy Alvis and E.G. Alvis v. Cit Group Equipment Financing, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Viada v. a & a MacHine Works, Inc. 914 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed solidarity in A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hospital, 94-2011 (La.6/30/95), , 1297: [U]nder article 1829(3), the initial inquiry is whether the obligor is bound "with or for others," and in order for an *1117 obligor to be bound, the obligation must be solidary and indivisible.
Hose v. Younger Bros., Inc. 878 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hospital, 94-2011, p. 5 (La.6/30/95), ; see Prudential Assurance Company Limited v. London & Hull Maritime Insurance Co. Ltd., 621 So .2d 1165, 1166-67 (La.App.
Perritt v. Dona 849 So. 2d 56 La. 2003
4 Cir. 1/19/96) , , writ denied, 96-0437 (La.4/8/96), ); and 2) to provide compensation to medical malpractice victims who have been injured by qualified health care providers (A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hospital, 94-2011 (La.6/30/95), , Tucker, supra .).
Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana v. State Farm 839 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
As stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 94-2011 (La.06/30/95), , "[S]ubrogation is the legal fiction established by law whereby an obligation, extinguished with regard to the original creditor by payment which he has received *1026 from a third person, or from the original debtor but with funds that a third person has provided, is regarded as substituting in favor of this third p
Vantage Health Plan, Inc. v. ACMG, Inc. 830 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hospital, 94-2011 (La.6/30/95), , cert.
Magic Moments Pizza v. LA. RESTAURANT ASS'N 819 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
See also, Copeland v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 94-2011 (La.6/30/95), pp. 1296-1297 .
St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Eusea 775 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hospital, 94-2011 (La.6/30/95), , and Prisk v. Palazzo, 95-1475 (La.App.
Dickens v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 762 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
A. Copeland Enters., Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 94-2011, p. 7 (La.6/30/95); .
Roberts v. Richard 743 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 94-2011 (La.6/30/95); .
Wilfer v. Derosier 732 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
However, the court, in A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 94-2011, p. 7 (La.6/30/95); , refused to extend their holding in Hoefly , to include medical insurers stating as follows: An obligation is solidary among debtors when they are obliged to do the same thing, so that either may be compelled to perform the whole obligation, and payment by one exonerates the other.
In Re Tutorship of Roy 726 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Cf. A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 94-2011 (La.06/30/95), .
Hampton v. Marino 725 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
art. 1829(3); A. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp., 94-2011 (La.6/30/95); .
Descant v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 706 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Descant v. ADM'RS OF TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND 706 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Achee v. National Tea Co. 686 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Barreca v. Cobb 668 So. 2d 1129 La. 1996
State ex rel. Department of Social Services ex rel. Harden v. Southern Baptist Hospital 663 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
6/30/95), , does not support his position since it does not involve recovery of a third party’s medical expenses.
STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV. v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 663 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
6/30/95), , does not support his position since it does not involve recovery of a third party's medical expenses.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by