Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lewis v. Hamilton, 652 So. 2d 1327.

13 citing documents.

In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation 63 So. 3d 955 La. 2011
Guaranty Assn. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co., Lewis v. Hamilton, 94-2204 (La.4/10/95), .
Dean v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 975 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
art.2050; Campbell v. Melton, 01-2578, p. 11 (La.5/14/02), ; Lewis v. Hamilton, 94-2204 (La.4/10/95), ; see also La.
Alpaugh ex rel. Alpaugh v. Continental Insurance Co. 863 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
arts.2045-2047; Lewis v. Hamilton, 94-2204 (La.4/10/95), .
Vignette Publications, Inc. v. Harborview Enterprises, Inc. 799 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
art.2046; Lewis v. Hamilton, 94-2204 (La.4/10/95), .
Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co. v. Belt 766 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Lewis v. Hamilton, 94-2204 (La.4/10/95), ; Block v. St.
Aucoin v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 771 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Lewis v. Hamilton, 94-2204 *97 (La.4/10/95); .
Etienne v. National Auto. Ins. Co. 759 So. 2d 51 La. 2000
Lewis v. Hamilton, 94-2204 (La.4/10/95), .
Hussain v. Enterprise Leasing Co., Inc. 735 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
In Lewis v. Hamilton, 94-2204 (La.4/10/95), , the court stated that the Civil Code articles and jurisprudence which mandate strict construction of a contract of adhesion are primarily designed to protect an unwary policyholder from the "small print" often injected into insurance contracts by those with superior bargaining power.
Minor v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 700 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Valentine v. Bonneville Ins. Co. 691 So. 2d 665 La. 1997
Palermo v. Audubon Insurance Co. 689 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
2045-2047 which recognize that if “the words of a contract are clear and explicit and lead to no absurd consequences, no further interpretation may be made in search of the intent of the parties.” Lewis v. Hamilton, 94-2204, p. 3 (La.4/10/95); .
Murray v. City of Bunkie 686 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Lewis v. Hamilton, 94-2204 (La.4/10/95); .
Butterfield v. C & M Construction Co. 676 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996